Latest Updates: women’s rights RSS

  • johnpi 8:51 am on December 27, 2009 | 0 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , , women's rights

    An article about a book published in 1898 by a Muslim scholar challenging interpretations of male supremacy over women.

    The ulema of Maulvi Mumtaz’s time ignored it, but its revolutionary thoughts are now warming the hearts of reformists in the community. “Quoting the Quran and Hadith, both Prophet Muhammad’s traditions, the maulvi convincingly explodes the myth of male supremacy and argues that the Quran is just to both sexes,” says Islamic reformist Asgar Ali Engineer who published Huququn Niswan (Rights of Women) a few months ago after he got a photocopy from a US library with an American scholar’s help.

    There are plans to publish the book in English, Hindi and Urdu.

     
  • johnpi 9:19 am on December 10, 2009 | 0 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , , , women's rights

    The chairwoman of the National Commission on Violence Against Women Kamala Chandra Kirana has urged the Indonesian government to review Islamic bylaws.

    An Indonesian organisation has urged the government to review a number of Islamic Sharia-based bylaws deemed discriminative against women as part of its first 100-days programme.

     
  • johnpi 11:07 pm on November 6, 2009 | 0 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , women's rights

    Saudiwoman blogs about the issue of runaway girls and women in Saudi Arabia, but she starts with this description of life in ultra-conservative Saudi families.

    Ultra-conservative Saudi families, and they are a majority, have a general dynamic that few Saudis could deny. Like old-fashioned western family ideologies, the father is the breadwinner, the mother takes care of the home-front, the sons are served and tolerated and the daughters are the bit of fluff that flutters around the house.

    But unlike most other cultures, daughters also have to contend with constant supervision of their every move. A job that some brothers feel falls on their shoulders. No matter what age a woman is, many families believe that as long as she is single, she is a liability. This translates into horrific intrusions of privacy and personal freedom. In one extreme case, a family I know has no locks on any of the doors including the bathroom doors, so that to insure the daughters cannot seclude themselves and do anything inappropriate; pre-approval of clothing, whether at home or when leaving the house, is common.

    A friend of mine once told me she had to sit for over two hours in an uncomfortable position because she had pajama pants on and was afraid her father, who had come early from work, would see them. And this is not only with teenage girls, but also adult women… even divorced mothers. So what’s a girl to do in this situation? Many go by the Arabic saying that translates into “a woman has only three places in this world: her family’s home, her husband’s home or her grave”.

    So the majority wait patiently for their knight to rescue them, others commit suicide and a few run away.

     
  • buzz 9:03 am on November 2, 2009 | 3 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , , , , , , women's rights

    ishr-burka-1CAIRO (Reuters) – Rokaya Mohamed, an elementary school teacher, would rather die than take off her face veil, or niqab, thrusting her to the forefront of a battle by government-backed clerics to limit Islamism in Egypt.

    Egypt’s state-run religious establishment wants teachers like Mohamed to remove their veils in front of female students, sparking a backlash by Islamists who say women should be able to choose to cover their faces in line with their Islamic faith.

    “I have put on the niqab because it is a Sunna (a tradition of the Muslim prophet Muhammad). It is something that brings me closer to religion and closer to the wives of the Prophet who used to wear it,” she said.

    “I know what makes God and his prophet love me, and no sheikh is going to convince me otherwise. I would rather die than take it off, even inside class,” she added.

    Egypt, the birthplace of al Qaeda’s second-in-command Ayman al-Zawahri, fought a low-level Islamist insurgency in the 1990s, has faced sporadic militant attacks targeting tourists since then, and is keen to quell Islamist opposition ahead of parliamentary elections next year and a 2011 presidential vote.

    The spread of the niqab, associated with the strictest interpretations of Islam, is a potent reminder to the government of the political threat posed by any Islamist resurgence emanating from the Gulf, where many young Egyptians go to work.

    (More …)

     
  • johnpi 7:31 am on October 26, 2009 | 0 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , , , women's rights,

    One of Kuwait’s four new women lawmakers wants to rescind a 2005 electoral law requiring women to comply with Shariah.

    Rola Dashti, who was elected to parliament in May, submitted a proposal to the court last week to remove a 2005 electoral law requirement that women must comply with Islamic Shariah law. The law doesn’t specify what that entails or which women it applies to.

    Last week, the government’s Fatwa Department complicated the matter when it ruled that under Shariah law, Muslim women are required to wear hijab. Conservative lawmakers say that fatwa must apply to parliament’s four female members (two of whom wear hijab, two of whom two do not), the U.A.E. newspaper The National reports. But Dashti has dismissed the fatwa as non-binding and has said that including Shariah regulations in the electoral law is a breach of the constitution.

    Dashti does not wear hijab.

     
  • johnpi 6:00 pm on October 24, 2009 | 0 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , , , women's rights

    Dalia Mogahed, Obama’s Muslim policy advisor, is angry about her treatment at the hands of Hizb ut Tahrir propagandists on a UK television show – as angry as she is at US conservatives who twist what she says to form an equally dishonest, distorted, ideological view of Islam.

    The HT representative on the program dismissed or “reinterpreted” findings I presented so as to not challenge the group’s simplistic utopian ideology which holds liberty in contempt as morally decadent. For example, as I regularly report, our research shows that far from denouncing democracy, Muslims around the world say it is among the things they most admire about the West, specifically mentioning “liberty” as a desirable attribute. Around the world, from Morocco to Malaysia, Muslim respondents described their respect for much of what the West holds dear: freedom of the press, the rule of law, and transparency and accountability of government.

    As much as HT selectively ignored and exploited these findings to push their propaganda, many conservative pundits who diametrically oppose HT’s vision of the world, did much the same. To them, my crime was that I reported that many Muslim women wanted sharia as a source of legislation. I also explained that Muslim women surveyed by Gallup said they believed they should have access to equal legal rights, free employment, voting without family influence, and even leadership positions in government. This suggests that many Muslim women see Sharia differently from those who use it to deny women rights. For simply stating results of survey research, I stood accused of “endorsing” Taliban-like rule, and downplaying the abuses done in the name of sharia.

     
  • johnpi 8:43 am on October 24, 2009 | 0 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , women's rights

    Kuwait grants women right to get passports without consent of husbands, guardians.

    Kuwait has granted the country’s women the right to obtain passports without the consent of their husbands or guardians, in a move applauded by a female lawmaker as “a victory for the constitution.”

    The Constitutional Court on Tuesday issued a ruling, abolishing an article in the 1962 passports law that asked women to get the approval of their husbands or guardians before applying for passports, local daily Kuwait Times reported Wednesday.

    The ruling said the article breaches a number of regulations in the constitution that guarantee personal freedom.

    Female lawmaker Aseel Al-Awadhi said the ruling has eliminated injustice against women and was a victory for the constitution in the Gulf Arab emirate.

    The Arab News reports that the ruling was prompted by the case of a Kuwaiti mother whose husband refused to allow her and her children a passport to prevent them from leaving the country.

     
  • johnpi 8:47 pm on October 11, 2009 | 1 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , , , , women's rights, ,

    Feminists from the Arab World: Women’s issues and feminist movements are discussed by scholar-activists from Saudi Arabia and Egypt at the first-ever conference, “Arab Feminisms: A Critical Perspective” – organized by the Lebanese Association of Women Researchers, Bahithat.

    Excerpt of an interview with Professor Hatoon Ajwad Al Fassi from Saudi Arabia:

    Can you explain briefly what you talked about in your presentation – about how feminism in Saudi Arabia – or the non-existence of it, as you question – developed over the last decades, and what kinds of historical contexts shaped the feminism in question?

    Al Fassi: I don’t think there is a political movement called feminism in Saudi Arabia, there isn’t such a thing. My definition of [a feminist] is someone who has an awareness of her being as a woman, who has rights. I consider this as a feminist consciousness. That is a kind of feminism if you like. This happens on different levels: a level that is very leftist, very liberal that has extreme demands and others that are to the right – Muslims or Islamists who have extreme demands from our point of view…

    So when it comes to practical issues, extreme Islamist feminists think that personal status laws are untouchable because they have to do with the Islamic faith?

    Al Fassi: Yes… Or they would say that these laws are the right ones in Islam and that nobody should question them. But the question is their application. And this is something that we agree on… But they go into more details that we disagree with, such as [the fact] that they believe that women should not go to work unless they are very needy, that the priority should be to stay at home and that the man should always provide for the woman.

     
  • buzz 3:51 pm on October 7, 2009 | 43 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , , women's rights

    More fun with veils.

    Abu Noor covered this story 1st and I unintentionally repeated it.  I disagree with his openning op/ed so I will leave this up as an alternate take.

    CAIRO — A Islamist lawmaker called on Wednesday for the head of the most prestigious centre of religious learning in the Sunni Muslim world to resign after he told a schoolgirl to remove the veil covering her face.

    The demand to step down came as about two dozen students, wearing the face veil, known as a niqab, protested outside the state-run Cairo University, which has banned the veils from its residence hall.

    Mohammed Tantawi, head of Al-Azhar University, told a schoolgirl to remove her niqab when he spotted her during a tour of an Al-Azhar affiliated school, the independent Al-Masry al-Youm newspaper reported this week.

    He also said he intended to ban the niqab at Al-Azhar and made an unflattering remark about the girl’s appearance when she took off the veil, the newspaper said.

    “And you look like this; what would you do if you were a bit pretty,” he reportedly asked, adding “I know more about religion than your parents.”

    Al-Azhar spokesman Ahmed Tawfiq confirmed Tantawi had asked the girl to remove the niqab, but said he spoke to her in a kindly way.

    He said Tantawi, who insists the niqab is not an Islamic practice, wanted to ban the niqab from Al-Azhar classrooms on religious grounds.

    “The imam always bases his decision on religious grounds,” said Tawfiq.

    Hamdi Hassan, an MP with the Muslim Brotherhood, Egypt’s largest opposition group, said “Tantawi cannot stay in his post; he hurt’s Al-Azhar every time he says something.

    “I believe the niqab is not an obligation, but it is a benefit,” he added. “Why ban it from Al-Azhar? It’s a religious institution, not a belly dancing academy.”

    Story continues…

     
  • thabet 1:08 am on September 2, 2009 | 0 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , , , , , , women's rights

    It says a lot for much-vaunted ‘French values’ that less than 500 women can threaten the French Fifth Republic.

    “The burqa is the tip of the iceberg,” [André] Gerin[, a Communist Party legislator and mayor of Vénissieux,] said. “Islamism really threatens us.” In a letter to the government, he wrote: “It is time to take a stand on this issue that concerns thousands of citizens who are worried to see imprisoned, totally veiled women.”

    Hossam el-Hamalawy was right when he noted:

    Some on the left in France r serious Islamophobic assholes.

    Also, according to The New York Times report, Nicolas Sarkozy “defends participation in the Afghan war as a matter of women’s rights”. I have an example below of Sarkozy clearly discussing women’s rights with his friend.

    null

     
  • thabet 6:04 am on August 28, 2009 | 0 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: islam.modernity, , , , women's rights

    Mali’s marriage law has been blocked:

    The president of Mali has announced that he is not going to sign the country’s new family law, instead returning it to parliament for review.

    Muslim groups have been protesting against the law, which gives greater rights to women, ever since parliament adopted it at the start of the month.

    Some more commentary from the the BBC’s Martin Vogl in Bamako.

     
  • thabet 3:18 am on August 24, 2009 | 0 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , women's rights

    The person behind this ’sociological image’ needs to read the following books: How to Lie with Statistics and The Visual Display of Quantitative Information.

    The subject matter — domestic violence against women — is bad enough without distortion through rubbish graphics.

     
  • johnpi 10:52 am on August 23, 2009 | 6 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , women's rights

    Comment from Thabet’s earlier post Lots of Malians are unhappy at a new law which gives women ‘equal rights in marriage’.

    “It’s a tiny minority of women here that wants this new law – the intellectuals. The poor and illiterate women of this country – the real Muslims – are against it,” she added.

    I found this to be an amazing ignorant comment considering that in Islam we are duty-bound to always seek knowledge.

    (Posting this as a front-page entry because the blog software keeps sending it to the spam folder when I try to enter it as a comment on Thabet’s post).

     
  • thabet 4:56 am on August 23, 2009 | 4 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , women's rights

    Lots of Malians are unhappy at a new law which gives women ‘equal rights in marriage’.

     
  • johnpi 5:08 pm on July 8, 2009 | 0 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , women's rights

    Photobucket

    At Muslimah Media Watch, analysis of this wonderful Dutch anti-discrimination ad, which targets prejudice against hijabis.

    The second reason why I love this image is because it completely reverses the looker’s expectation of hijab. Instead of the hijab hiding some aspect of the woman, it is society’s pressure for conformity that is making the woman hide an aspect of herself. The discrimination that woman is receiving, which in turn is discouraging her from wearing hijab, is damaging to her, not her hijab. In fact, the hijab is given a role of liberator in the ad. By not discriminating against the woman for wearing hijab, by letting her wear it, we are liberating her to be who she wants to be in the public sphere.

     
  • johnpi 11:48 pm on June 26, 2009 | 0 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , women's rights,

    An article on the presence of beautiful Iranian women in the coverage of the Iranian elections in the West, from Women’s News Network.

    The article concludes, “the visual narrative may emphasize clothing and beauty, but we should not be so distracted by images that we miss the message underneath the make-up,” that message being:

    This particular election, however, brought remarkable voter turnout as the women of Iran made a decision to take their dissatisfaction to the ballot boxes. In an earlier piece for Jezebel, Carpentier lays out “10 Reasons Why You Should Be Following the Iranian Elections,” parsing out the key themes that are fueling the political fires. Most of them trace back to women’s rights. Women’s rights activists have been jailed for protesting the changes the Ahmadinejad administration ushered in, including allowing the growth of employment discrimination, legislation that attacks women’s financial freedom and renaming the Center for Women’s Participation as the Center for Women and Families (and the goal of the newly named agency would be to promote women returning to more traditional roles).

    The article ends with a 4-minute video montage of images reportedly of Iranian women being accosted and ticketed by policemen and policewomen “wearing full-length black chadors” enforcing dress codes.

     
  • johnpi 7:51 am on June 8, 2009 | 0 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , women's rights

    Discussion on Obama’s Cairo speech and women’s rights at Nuseiba:

    [Fatemeh] Fakhraie is right in observing the importance of Obama highlighting the gender inequality existing in Western countries, “We often forget that when we point our fingers at other countries and find things about their gender systems objectionable, we’re living in a glass house built upon obscene rates of discrimination, rape, and violence against women. That doesn’t absolve anyone, but Obama carefully reminded us that we are all moving forward together in improving things for women”.

    Muslims often react to Western critics like [Annie] Sugier by reminding them they have their own backyard to clean up. Such responses have almost stifled the debate on women’s rights in a cross-cultural setting. Perhaps Obama was aware of this when he says “issues of women’s equality are by no means an issue simply for Islam”.

    So although I’m not intoxicated by Obama mania and had serious issues with aspects of his speech, his references to women’s rights were satisfactory. Women’s rights groups critical of him have just overreacted [to Obama's defense of the hijab].

     
  • johnpi 7:09 pm on June 1, 2009 | 0 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , women's rights

    Leading Iranian reformist candidate “condemns” his own female supporters for refusing to follow country’s strict dress code. The incident came just one day after he declared support for a host of women’s rights initiatives in a speech to his female supporters.

    Controversy erupted this weekend when the Iranian daily Jomhouri-Eslami blasted groups of female supporters of the reformist candidate who refrained from “properly” adhering to rules requiring all women to dress modestly and wear the hijab, a modest head covering for Muslim women.

    “In recent days, a well-planned conspiracy has been developed by certain girls and women against Mir-Hossein Moussavi,” the article stated, pointing to “immoral acts” committed by various female supporters of Moussavi while holding campaign posters of the candidate. The article insinuated the women were intentionally attempting to tarnish Moussavi’s image.

    Moussavi responded on Sunday by publicly criticizing the un-Islamic appearance of some of his female supporters, claiming they could ruin his presidential bid.

     
  • razib, murtad fitri 2:58 pm on May 18, 2009 | 0 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , women's rights

    First Women Win Seats in Kuwait Parliament.

     
  • johnpi 1:15 pm on May 15, 2009 | 1 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , , , , , , women's rights

    For the western forum that Huffington Post represents, a producer for Link TV focuses on how the Western media conflates Talibanization and Shariah law, and how many women support Islamic law but oppose the Taliban.

    However, the actual video she produced for Link TV, Women vs the Taliban, which surveys worldwide media coverage of the Taliban and the women who resist them, also highlights the denial that has been prevalent until recently about how aberrant the Taliban actually are. A clip from Nai Rahain’s Pakistani TV talk show is excerpted. Here, Rahain describes two guests responses on her show after the flogging video came to light:

    Both my Peshawar guests were in complete denial of women’s rights being violated in Swat, to the extent that Mr. Shahraaz Khan accused Samaa of ‘making up’ this [flogging] video and doing a great disservice to Pakistan by airing it. Ms. Shagufta Malik was firm in her belief that her government had a solid control of the area and post peace-deal no such events had taken place. They both denied women being banned from leaving their homes or accessing public places, even though my sources confirmed that due to threats from TTP, shopkeepers of popular markets in Swat and Malakand including Bara Market, Sitara Market, Abaseen Market, Waqar Market and Waqas Market had strictly prohibited women coming unaccompanied by male family members.

     
  • johnpi 3:29 pm on May 4, 2009 | 0 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , , women's rights

    Kuwait’s Salafis call voting for women a sin.

    [Fuhaid al-Hailam, of the Islamic Salafi Alliance politburo] denied the fatwa, or religious ruling, is politically motivated to undermine women’s chances to win seats in the parliament.

     
  • johnpi 9:24 pm on May 2, 2009 | 0 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , women's rights

    A Saudi Arabian blogger has published an expose about women reporters in that country suffering sexual harassment and having to sleep with their bosses to keep jobs and get promotions. The blogger, Hedayah Darwish, also reports that Saudi journalists sometimes resort to using drugs and alcohol. As most any reporter will tell you, use and abuse of substances is sadly far more common than it should be among those in that profession due to the stress and the sometimes inhuman demands that come with the job, so this is not a wild report.

    Now however, it seems the bosses and editors she exposed are utilizing the Saudi Journalists Association to destroy her, with 13 female journalists smearing Darwish and calling for a government crackdown and new round of censorship of bloggers and e-newspapers that publish “content that creates social harm and negative images.” (The gender of the accusers is important because they claim Darwish impugned female journalists only, but Darwish seems to deny that in the Arab News article linked above.) The attack on Darwish is a trojan horse that may allow the traditional print journalists of Saudi Arabia, who operate under more restrictive censorship rules than their online brothers, to cut out the competition by prompting a government over-reaction that squashes access to Internet information sources in that country.

    Aside from that larger issue, the most important journalistic question that arises out of the story is this: Is the report accurate? If the story is accurate then there is no issue, since the truth should be the highest value as a standard of personal, professional, societal and even religious integrity. “Social harm” and “negative images” should be secondary considerations to the truth in a country that claims the Quran for its constitution.

    If Darwish’s story contained inaccuracies, the Saudi journalists should have published reports that corrected the inaccuracies and set the record straight. Instead they acted like Stalinist toadies and called for a full-on government slam-down on Internet publishers. So I’m creating a new tag here at TalkIslam “Faux Journalist Watch” to go with the “Faux Feminist Watch”, both of which seem to apply to this story.

     
  • johnpi 8:23 am on May 1, 2009 | 0 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , , Indian secret agents, , , , , , women's rights

    Denial-istan.

    In the absence of national leadership or even basic coherence at the top, rumors and ideological punditry masquerade as reason. A television anchor insists that all the attacks are the handiwork of Indian intelligence agents. A talking head on another channel claims that the Taliban are misunderstood – all they want to do is to bring swift justice to the country. Another strategic expert assures viewers that everything happening in Pakistan is the U.S.’s fault. Drone attacks are creating anti-Americanism, and its only natural that those attacked will retaliate wherever they can. If the US were to simply stop the drone attacks on Pakistan, everything would be just fine. The fact that Pakistan was spinning out of control well before anyone had heard the term drone hamla, is left out of the conversation.

    More Denial-istan.

    The conservatives themselves are men reacting to the threatening Western presence and targeting women who are often the victims of wars and the political instability that it brings. With the threat of outsiders, women become burdened with the need to carry and preserve culture.

    If it weren’t for those darn outsiders…

     
  • johnpi 7:51 am on April 11, 2009 | 0 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , Afghanistan constitution, , , women's rights

    Afghanistan’s ambassador to Washington says the Shia family law that is reported to legalize forced marital sex “will not become the law, because it contradicts some important principles of the Afghan constitution.” Meanwhile, a leading Afghan Shi’ite cleric has said not allowing the legislation to become law would violate the constitution. “The Justice Ministry has no right to change any article,” said Mohseni, who is widely regarded as the religious leader of Afghanistan’s Shi’ite minority. “Any changes it brings will be against the constitution.”

     
  • johnpi 2:42 pm on April 7, 2009 | 0 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , , women's rights

    Male officers in the Kuwaiti army have expressed embarrassment at having to salute female superiors as the interior ministry denied rumors it was considering offering monetary compensation to female officers in return for not demanding to be saluted by male officers.

     
  • thabet 12:20 am on April 6, 2009 | 3 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , , women's rights

    European pressure forces Hamid Karzai to reconsider the so-called ‘rape law’*.

    *See these comments from Ikram.

     
  • aziz 1:01 pm on March 31, 2009 | 15 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , women's rights

    I excoriate Obama’s Administration for their silence on Afghanistan’s rape law. Mayor of Kabul, indeed…

     
  • johnpi 11:19 am on March 31, 2009 | 7 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , women's rights

    Today, the UK Independent reports that Afghan President Hamid Karzai has signed the new Shia Family Law, which women’s groups believe will essentially legalize rape. Specifically, the measure “negates the need for sexual consent between married couples, tacitly approves child marriage and restricts a woman’s right to leave the home.”

    “There are moderate views among the Shia, but unfortunately our MPs, the people who draft the laws, rely on extremists.”

     
  • johnpi 5:30 pm on March 11, 2009 | 4 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , , , women's rights

    Aziza Ahmed writes:

    I am a South Asian not for Bobby Jindal….

    For many, including South Asians, what will matter more than Jindal’s retrogressive positions will be his veneer: a well educated young Indian politician whose family achieved the American dream and more. For Republicans, a party with almost no diversity, he will be something different – a “beige” (instead of white) face that still has the long-standing and comforting desire to prevent women from controlling their own bodies and stop immigrants from trying to live a decent and healthy life. Like many who oppose the right of women to choose, Jindal has turned a deaf ear to the known secrets of South Asian women’s lives – the lives of women in his own community.

     
  • johnpi 10:32 am on March 3, 2009 | 0 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , women's rights

    In Afghanistan, idea of women’s rights starts taking hold.

     
c
compose new post
j
next post/next comment
k
previous post/previous comment
r
reply
e
edit
o
show/hide comments
t
go to top
esc
cancel