Latest Updates: religion and science RSS

  • johnpi 10:50 am on December 4, 2009 | 0 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: King Abdullah University, , religion and science, , , , ,

    Al Qaeda on Arabian Peninsula’s mufti tees off on new King Abdullah University of Science and Technology. (More on the opening of the university here)

    In early November, [Ibrahim Suleiman al] Rubaish questioned Saudi King Abdullah’s decision to allow men and women to jointly attend the new King Abdullah University of Science and Technology. According to a translation of Rubaish’s statement prepared by the SITE Intelligence group, Rubaish blasted the decision as a violation of sharia law and said that King Abdullah was moving his country towards “secularism.”

    “If [King Abdullah] is not able to distinguish between good and evil and what is good and harmful, then how can he be put as the ruler over millions of people?,” Rubaish asked. “I call upon every Muslim to (distance themselves) from this agent apostate government, that has clearly demonstrated that it prefers infidelity to faith, and that all it wants from Islam is the parts that do not affect its secularist method.”

    I suspect the original motivation for creating the university had something to do with feelings of frustration and humiliation about this:

    …despite the efforts of scientists and researchers throughout the region, the Arab world makes up only 1.1% of global scientific publishing and the low level of investment into research has led to relatively low levels of innovation throughout the Arab world.

    I doubt a scientific research institution under an extremist regime would be able to do much to address the problem.

     
  • johnpi 8:58 am on September 25, 2009 | 1 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , , religion and science, , ,

    Aziz Huq at altMuslim recently wrote, “…many American Muslims share the Republican party’s social views.” Some conservatives in the Muslim community share a perception with Republicans that indicts science for ‘imposing’ secular teachings on religious peoples.

    Here’s one expression of those views, that’s been crafted into a law in Oklahoma:

    The Oklahoma House of Representatives Education Committee has just approved House Bill 2211.

    The bill requires public schools to guarantee students the right to express their religious viewpoints in a public forum, in class, in homework and in other ways without being penalized. If a student’s religious beliefs were in conflict with scientific theory, and the student chose to express those beliefs rather than explain the theory in response to an exam question, the student’s incorrect response would be deemed satisfactory, according to this bill.

    The school would be required to reward the student with a good grade, or be considered in violation of the law. Even simple, factual information such as the age of the earth (4.65 billion years) would be subject to the student’s belief, and if the student answered 6,000 years based on his or her religious belief, the school would have to credit it as correct. Science education becomes absurd under such a situation.

    We don’t need your stinkin’ science anyway.

    And consider this from a kid’s perspective: Why bother studying for the test when you can just feign religion and get a good grade anyway?

     
  • razib, murtad fitri 2:25 pm on September 20, 2008 | 3 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: religion and science

    follow-up on comment thread below. there are some atheists who think that religion and science are totally disjoint and that one can not have one with the other in the same mind. i do not agree with this. i think there are plenty of ways to accommodate religion and science, though i personally don’t have to worry about this. but, when religious truth claims are brought into direct contradiction to scientific certitude then i think it is important to call a spade a spade. i do not think that the accusation that some militant atheists make toward religion qua religion as a medieval and backward institution are supported; but, i do think that accusations that creationist religion is medieval and backward is fundamentally correct. though, to be sure it is not an authentic traditional reading of religion as much as an anti-modern reaction against contemporary trends.

    as an atheist it follows that i don’t care *how* religious people align the precepts of their faith toward reality. e.g., many catholics hold to the position that adam and eve did exist because they were the first hominids who were gifted by god with souls and so were the first humans. *philosophically* i disagree with this, but *scientifically* i can’t really falsify it.

     
c
compose new post
j
next post/next comment
k
previous post/previous comment
r
reply
e
edit
o
show/hide comments
t
go to top
esc
cancel