Andrew Sullivan pointed me today to this Daniel Larison piece , which labels this idea “The Crazy Kashmir Option.”  Larison and some commenters essentially argue that the dispute is extremely thorny with the risks of the situation ‘blowing up’ perhaps the biggest credible nightmare scenario on the current geopolitical scene (all that is my phrasing), that India in no way wants U.S. intervention (although Pakistan might) and that in fact any attempts of the U.S. to intervene would only make India less likely to do any kind of deal.

What of the Kashmiris themselves, who have repeatedly found themselves reduced to pawns in the geopolitical games and domestic politics of their neighbors? In 1989 and ’90, when few Kashmiris had heard of Osama bin Laden, hundreds of thousands of Muslims buoyed by popular revolutions in Eastern Europe regularly petitioned the United Nations office in Srinagar, hoping to raise the world’s sympathy for their cause. Indian troops responded by firing into many of these largely peaceful demonstrations, killing hundreds of people and provoking many young Kashmiris to take to arms and embrace radical Islam.

A new generation of politicized Kashmiris has now risen; the world is again likely to ignore them — until some of them turn into terrorists with Qaeda links. It is up to the Indian government to reckon honestly with Kashmiri aspirations for a life without constant fear and humiliation. Some first steps are obvious: to severely cut the numbers of troops in Kashmir; to lift the economic blockade on the Kashmir Valley; and to allow Kashmiris to trade freely across the line of control with Pakistan.

The Economist has some more background.

Meanwhile, Hindu protesters have been arrested by police in the Jammu region, following the state government’s decision not to grant a small piece of land to a trust running a Hindu shrine.