Latest Updates: Jeffrey Goldberg RSS

  • abunoor 6:01 pm on November 4, 2009 | 1 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , Hussein Ibish, Jeffrey Goldberg, , ,

    Former Progressive Muslim leader (although self admittedly not a Muslim by belief) Hussein Ibish is here promoted by Jeffrey Goldberg for his attacks on the idea of the one-state solution which is gaining strength among a strand of Palestinian activists here in America.

    Ibish, who is currently described as “Senior Fellow at the American Task Force on Palestine” (referred by As’ad Abu Khalil as the “Dahlan Lobby” or “Dahlan Embassy” in Washington). Ibish seems to be frustrated that his pro two-state arguments are not being engaged by the one-state proponents, including Ali Abunimah. Ibish used to be at least professionally close with Abunimah, coauthoring several items, but claims that Abunimah views have shifted radically in recent years. He know accuses him of being an extremist and an Islamist sympathizer (all of this discussion is taking place essentially among secularist thinkers, although some Muslims are undoubtedly supporters of Abunimah and Abu Khalil, etc. in their critique at least). Let me be clear that Abunimah does engage with all range of arguments and critiques of his one-state proposal in his book and in the media, but apparently has chosen not to engage specifically with the work of Mr. Ibish.

    Now, Mr. Ibish is interviewed at some length by Jeffrey Goldberg (a figure whom I, shall we say, do not admire) about how the one state solution is fantasy. I actually have had some conversations with a Modern Orthodox Rabbi here in Chicago with whom I have done several interfaith programs, who is planning to move next year to Israel, who is also a supporter of a one state solution.

    Let me say that although I certainly oppose occupation and support the right of the Palestinian people to self-determination, I personally find it hard to get excited about or invested in supporting a Abu Mazen/Dahlan bantustan state as the outcome of the long Palestinian/Muslim struggle in the holy land. I understand the difficulties of a one state solution but it is more inspiring to me than the illusory peace process. Again, at the end of the day I am really an observer. Although I am emotionally invested due to the sacredness of Jerusalem, my love for my Muslim brothers and sisters in Palestine, and my concern for all humans everywhere including Israelis and Jews, I realize that it is not up to me to decide what the Palestinian people do, let alone can I determine what Israel will do.

     
  • johnpi 11:55 pm on October 28, 2009 | 0 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , Jeffrey Goldberg, , ,

    Neoconservative pundits like Michael Goldfarb and Jeffrey Goldberg of The Atlantic have launched a ‘dual loyalty’ smear campaign against Trita Parsi of the National Iranian American Council (NIAC). The charge is flat out absurb. NIAC was a consistently excellent source of information and opposition research and support during the recent uprising in Iran. I linked many blog posts from NIAC during the uprising.

    Why, then, is he being attacked as a stooge for the Iranian regime? The answer is simple: while Parsi has harshly criticized the regime’s actions, he has joined Iran’s leading opposition figures in opposing the use of sanctions or military force against Iran, on the grounds that they would be likely simply to kill innocent Iranian civilians while strengthening the regime’s hold on power.

    For the Iran hawks, this is a mortal sin. They will settle for nothing less than an Iranian Ahmed Chalabi — someone willing to tell them precisely what they want to hear, to claim that the Iranian people want to be bombed.

     
  • abunoor 4:13 pm on October 26, 2009 | 4 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , Jeffrey Goldberg

    Jeffrey Goldberg comes to the defense of Dalia Mogahed.

    Mogahed was a phone-in guest on the show, and only after did she learn that it was affiliated with Hizb ut-Tahrir, which advocates for very ugly things. Instantly, it was assumed by some of the more reflexive critics of anything Muslim that Mogahed herself was an advocate for extremism. Well, I know Dalia Mogahed, and if she’s a Muslim extremist, then I’m the King of Sweden. From everything I can see, Dalia went on the show in her role as a pollster, and, in the conversation, stuck to her polling data. I’ve heard her present the same findings she presented on British television on two separate occasions. I’m sure some people are freaked out by Dalia’s appearance — she covers her hair and dresses very traditionally, though she is not a “veiled woman” in the language of some of the more ridiculous posts on the subject — but I know her as a devout, modest and sensible woman, someone who likes being American very much, and someone who even has — shocking though it may seem — Jews to her home at Ramadan (that would be moi, along with Mrs. Goldblog and several smaller Goldblogs). Do we agree on much? Nah, especially on Middle East politics. But so what? I don’t agree with this guy on everything, and I don’t think he’s a member of Hizb ut-Tahrir.

     
c
compose new post
j
next post/next comment
k
previous post/previous comment
r
reply
e
edit
o
show/hide comments
t
go to top
esc
cancel