Let me start off by saying that I can’t think of anything (ok, actually accepting Islam would be possiblly the one thing) that would make me defend the British monarchy, and I suppose by this point I am only letting him win by paying attention, but I find something quite strange about this HItchens piece on Slate.
He goes from critiquing Charles as silly generally to specifically attacking some (what seems to me to be) spiritual perennialist type language used to express concern about the environment to all of a sudden in the last paragraph saying that “where this leads” is to a global caliphate starting from Europe. Is he suggesting that this is Charles’ aim? That he is an unwitting pawn in the hands of European Muslims bent on world domination through expressions of concern about the environment? Am I spending more time trying to understand this piece than he did writing it? (Actually this piece almost seems like a self parody of Hitchens)
Yakoub 11:49 pm on June 14, 2010 Permalink | Log in to Reply
I thought that was one of the 10 commandments of lefties-turned-Neocons is “Thou shalt parody thyself to the point of grotesque absurdity”. By the way, I hear Hitch is planning to rewrite the (proper) 10 commandments for the 21st century. I wish he’d rewrite his own DNA, the twerp.
thabet 11:59 pm on June 14, 2010 Permalink | Log in to Reply
He probably found out about this from his son, a keen ‘watcher’ of political Islam, as I doubt Hitchens Snr would really care enough to follow the politics of IFE et al.
Hitch 6:07 pm on June 15, 2010 Permalink | Log in to Reply
Not a very articulate and clear piece. Needless to say Charles’ speech was ridiculous rather independent of the target audience.
Galileo is hardly the starting point of radical capitalist materialism, nor is secular the polar opposite of religion, but rather the notion of pluralism in world view with an implied separation of religion and government. As a potential future head of state with a state curch and a secular constitution, he really should know this stuff. So he has just whacked out premises and the rest that follows doesn’t really make sense.
Some of the most prominent environmentalists are … well not what Charles thinks.
Abu Noor 9:29 pm on June 15, 2010 Permalink | Log in to Reply
There are many different kinds of secularism and many different meanings of the word Hitch. BTW, have not read Charles’ speech.