Latest Updates: Afghan Taliban RSS

  • johnpi 3:35 pm on March 1, 2010 | 0 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: Afghan Taliban, , , , , ,

    This is dumb: Afghanistan bans coverage of Taliban attacks.

    Afghanistan on Monday announced a ban on news coverage showing Taliban attacks, saying such images embolden the Islamist militants, who have launched strikes around the country as NATO forces seize their southern strongholds.

    The Taliban are making their own videos, they don’t need the media to get video drama when they’re standing right next to it. Here’s a Frontline documentary that aired on Tuesday, “Behind Taliban Lines.” At one point one of the fighters is shown holding up a small device – either a cell phone or a small digital camera – showing off video of one their own attacks.

    This ruling is self-serving on the part of the Afghan government.

     
  • johnpi 7:38 pm on January 20, 2010 | 2 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: Afghan Taliban, , , , ,

    Taliban overhaul their image in bid to win allies.

    …as the Taliban deepen their presence in more of Afghanistan, they are in greater need of popular support and are recasting themselves increasingly as a local liberation movement, independent of Al Qaeda, capitalizing on the mounting frustration of Afghans with their own government and the presence of foreign troops. The effect has been to make them a more potent insurgency, some NATO officials said.

    Afghan villagers and some NATO officials added that the code had begun to change the way some midlevel Taliban commanders and their followers behaved on the ground. A couple of the most brutal commanders have even been removed by Mullah Omar.

    I don’t know how significant a development this is in relation to the entire Afghan nation, since the Taliban aren’t going to be growing their presence outside of Pashtun areas any time soon, what with all the hurt feelings about scorched earth property destruction, massacres, taking the local women for concubines, etc. leftover from the 1990s civil war that was really a Pakistan-aided war of aggression against other ethnic and Muslim groups in the country…

     
  • johnpi 9:47 am on January 14, 2010 | 0 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: Afghan Taliban, , , , , ,

    Afghan market suicide bombing ‘kills 20.’

     
  • johnpi 12:39 am on January 2, 2010 | 0 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , Afghan Taliban, , , , ,

    Iran, Turkey rule out ‘military solution’ for Afghanistan.

    That’s a commendable change of heart for Iran, considering that 12 years ago it had over a quarter million troops massed on its border with Afghanistan, and the UN and the rest of the world were working hard to head off the perceived threat of an invasion of Afghanistan.

    This was taken very seriously at the time, as this Iranian writer communicates:

    I don’t want another war, no matter what the excuse. I don’t want us to march on Herat or further afield. No reason that has been stated by the Iranian government is good enough basis for an invasion of Afghanistan. I was devastated when I read the Amnesty International report stating that the 11 Iranian diplomats in Mazar-e-Sharif were killed after the fall of the city. The image of the bodies left in the Consulate for two days without burial shattered me. I thought of the rubble, I thought of the sound of artillery in the background and of rivers of blood. But even this atrocity and the humiliation attendant to it is not a reason good enough for a war. Nor is the Iranian government’s crying foul of the brand of Islam practiced by the Taleban. It is NONE of their business.

    That was during the time that the Taliban had taken control of the major city of Herat – predominantly Shiite and Farsi-speaking – and were engaged in their now infamous acts of ‘forced reIslamization.’ There was a concern that if Iran engaged with the Taliban it could draw in Pakistan (Iran had believed the 11 murdered diplomats had the protection of ISI personnel who were traveling as military advisors with the Taliban).

    One way for Americans to look at this is that withdrawing troops from Afghanistan to let some other military power step up that is convinced it cannot live with a Taliban government such as Iran or Russia would be just fine.

     
  • johnpi 12:07 am on December 27, 2009 | 4 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: Afghan Taliban, , , ,

    Two Sikh women, angry at Sikhs being mistaken for “Muslim extremists” wrote a post earlier this year, ‘How to tell a Sikh from a Taliban.’

    Do to a certain shallow, outward physical resemblance to some Muslim extremists, our Sikh community has been under attack since the 9/11 terrorist attacks by those who don’t know any better. Now events in Pakistan, where the Taliban has attacked the Sikhs of the SWAT Valley, forcing them out of their homes, make a comparison of the two groups mandatory for anyone who really wants to understand world events. (And to stop picking on innocent Sikhs, as well.)

    And a disclaimer:

    Before I start, let me say that in writing about the Taliban, I am not indicting the Muslim community, which has many good, upright adherents, some of whom I am honoured to include among my friends. Please do not construct anything I say about Taliban to apply to the millions of Muslims who are peaceful, constructive and valued citizens of countries all over the world.

    And then they really let the Taliban have it…

     
  • johnpi 6:46 pm on December 25, 2009 | 0 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: Afghan Taliban, , , , , , ,

    Afghanistan: Marines move in to stop Taliban infiltrating from Pakistan.

    As part of Obama’s Afghanistan war surge, some 9,000 marines are moving into small Afghan towns near the border to stop Taliban soldiers and supplies coming from Pakistan. The view from this new front.

    Also: The Taliban blew up three more schools today in Pakistan.

     
  • johnpi 9:17 am on December 23, 2009 | 0 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: Afghan Taliban, , , , ,

    Remember, the Pakistani and Afghan Taliban are two totally different movements, and no discerning observer would try to discuss them in the same breath.

    A top Pakistani Taliban commander says he has sent thousands of fighters to neighbouring Afghanistan to rebuff incoming US troops, a claim that comes as a Pakistani army offensive is believed to have pushed many of his men to flee their main redoubt.

    The story goes on to say that it is probably propaganda, but it shows they don’t think of themselves as being all that separate…

     
  • johnpi 8:56 am on December 20, 2009 | 6 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: afghan americans, Afghan Taliban, ,

    Differing opinions among Afghan-Americans about US occupation.

    Amena Chenzaie, a 34-year-old World Bank employee whose parents moved to the D.C. area from Afghanistan when she was six, is grateful to American troops for saving Afghan women from the Taliban. “From an Afghan-American woman’s perspective, I support Obama sending more troops over there at this time… I can’t even find a word to describe the condition of women living under the Taliban — the curfews, the abuse. The women are prospering now.”

    But Sonali Kolhatkar, co-director of the Afghan Women’s Mission in Pasadena, CA, says the war and the lawlessness in her native country are making life even worse for women than they were under the Taliban.

    The differences may have to do – in part – with ethnicity and regional focus. Non-Pashtun populations who suffered under the Taliban’s coercive ‘reIslamization” policies are likely quite happy, especially the women since they were targeted. But Pashtuns who enjoyed the privileges that came with having their own ethnic militia rule the whole country, may be less happy with the turn of events.

     
  • johnpi 11:19 am on December 16, 2009 | 0 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: Afghan Taliban, , , , ,

    More comforting lies.

    On Monday, the Peshawar Press Club was the venue of a seminar entitled ‘Conspiracies of US and India against Pakistan’ at which the speakers advocated talks with the Taliban on the grounds that the fight in Afghanistan is a ‘nationalist struggle’ and the violence in Pakistan is the direct result of the American presence in the region.

    “Nationalist struggle”: It was a common misconception promoted by Musharraf that the Afghan Taliban were the same thing as the Afghan people. The half of the country that lives north of the Hindu Kush and are of different ethnic groups would beg to differ. Even among the Pashtuns, the extent to which the Taliban are in leadership is largely because they have killed off the tribal elders in those areas, or cowed them with ‘night letters’ and other threats.

     
  • johnpi 10:43 am on December 15, 2009 | 0 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: Afghan Taliban, , , , , , ,

    US military and intelligence officials think the real reason that the Pakistani military won’t go after the Quetta shura and militants in North Waziristan is that such actions would escalate what is already a “low-grade conflict” within the military into a civil war.

    “Even if he wanted to moved against Haqqani, I think General Kiyani is concerned the move will spark the nationalist elements of the Army and ISI [the Inter-Services Intelligence] to side with the pro-Islamists, and spark a civil war within the military,” said a senior US intelligence official contacted by The Long War Journal.

    There is already a low-grade conflict within the military and intelligence services over the Pakistani Army’s move against the Mehsud branch of the Taliban in South Waziristan and the tribal areas.

    “The reality is the Taliban have been able to successfully conduct attacks against secured targets, particularly GHQ [Army General headquarters] in Rawalpindi, because they’ve had inside help,” the official continued. “The military at least can say the TTP [the Movement of the Taliban in Pakistan led by Hakeemullah Mehsud] is conducting attacks against Pakistan; Kiyani can’t make that argument with the Haqqanis or the Quetta Shura. It would be a bridge too far.”

     
  • johnpi 7:16 pm on December 14, 2009 | 3 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: Afghan Taliban, , , , , , , , ,

    Refreshing honesty from the Pakistani military.

    Demands by the United States for Pakistan to crack down on the strongest Taliban warrior in Afghanistan, Siraj Haqqani, whose fighters pose the biggest threat to American forces, have been rebuffed by the Pakistani military, according to Pakistani military officials and diplomats.

    The Obama administration wants Pakistan to turn on Mr. Haqqani, a longtime asset of Pakistan’s spy agency who uses the tribal area of North Waziristan as his sanctuary. But, the officials said, Pakistan views the entreaties as contrary to its interests in Afghanistan beyond the timetable of President Obama’s surge, which envisions drawing down American forces beginning in mid-2011.
    ….

    The demands have been accompanied by strong suggestions that if the Pakistanis cannot take care of the problem, including dismantling the Taliban leadership based in Quetta, Pakistan, then the Americans will by resorting to broader and more frequent drone strikes in Pakistan.

    But the Pakistanis have greeted the refrain with official public silence and private anger, illustrating the widening gulf between the allies over the Afghan war.

    Because the Pakistani military would like to have their own proxy, easily controllable government in Afghanistan – but for some reason we don’t call Pakistani meddling in Afghanistan foreign interference.

     
  • johnpi 10:01 am on December 12, 2009 | 0 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , Afghan Taliban, , ,

    There has recently been many approving comments in the media about the US raising the salary it pays to Afghan army soldiers, and that the rate may be higher than what the ‘Taliban’ pays its conscripts. A response from somebody who is in Afghanistan:

    Is it just me or is this reasoning barely fit for a tenth-grade debating society? Sure, many insurgents are paid for their activities (planting IED’s, launching indirect or direct attacks, etc.), but they are hardly salaried fighters in the same sense that the members of the Afghan security forces are. It’s not as if they see competing ads in the paper for jobs with the ANA and with the “Taliban” and since the latter pay more they go ahead and sign up for the black turban crew. Come on people, this is just intellectually lazy! When someone decides to take part in the insurgency, there are a range of motivating factors, but even if the ANA was paying more money that’s not to say that people would be flocking to fight for a government that is seen as incompetent at best and hostile to the Pashtuns at worst.

    The mood in the West now sounds like everyone is out to find the quick and easy key to victory in A’stan. Yes, that includes you Mr. Obama and your short-sighted “18-month” statement (I don’t care how it gets spun, people here on the ground just heard; “we will start to leave in 18 months,” and they started rethinking their long term personal strategies).

    The only thing that comes quickly in a counterinsurgency is defeat.

     
  • johnpi 9:55 am on December 11, 2009 | 0 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: Afghan Taliban, ,

    Great moments in credibility: Pakistani defense minister says we’ve already defeated the Quetta shura but forgot to call a press conference.

    The government has admitted the existence of the Afghan Taliban’s Quetta shura for the first time, and says it has taken them on.

    In an exclusive interview with DawnNews, Defence Minister, Ahmad Mukhtar said security forces have taken on the Quetta shura and have damaged it to such an extent that it no longer poses any threat.

    Throughout the offensive in South Waziristan, the Pakistani military held press conferences and communicated with the media about the progress of the campaign. Now the defense minister says the battle with the Taliban leadership in Quetta already happened without even a single report of conflict or resistance, not even a phone call to local media while it was happening?

    Nothing to see here, just move along.

     
  • johnpi 10:10 pm on December 7, 2009 | 11 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: Afghan Taliban, , , , ,

    Finally, some credit and respect is given where it is due.

    …one of the great mistakes of the media is that it tends to assume the only actors in the campaign against Islamist militants are governments, with al Qaeda and the Taliban merely passive players.

    “Beyond the details of what the Taliban and its allies decide, it is important to note that most analysis of Barack Obama’s strategy published in the western media is severely constrained by its selective perspective. There is a pervasive assumption – even now, after eight years of war – that the insurgents are mere “recipients” of external policy changes: reactive but not themselves proactive,” he writes.

    “This is nonsense – and dangerous nonsense. It would be far wiser to assume that these militias have people who are every bit as intelligent and professional in their thinking and planning as their western counterparts. They have had three months to think through the Obama leadership’s policy-development process; and much of this thinking will be about how the US changes affect their own plans – not how they will respond to the United States. Thus they may have very clear intentions for the next three to five years that are embedded in detailed military planning; and what is now happening on their side will involve adjustment of these plans in the light of the great rethink across the Atlantic.”

     
  • johnpi 11:18 am on December 6, 2009 | 0 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: Afghan Taliban, , , Saudi intelligence agency, , ,

    US in back-channel negotiations with the Afghan Taliban.

    The ISI and Saudi intelligence agency are facilitating.

     
  • johnpi 10:12 pm on December 4, 2009 | 0 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: Afghan refugee camps, Afghan Taliban, , , , , , ,

    Invasion ‘lite.’

    Pakistani analysts express concern about US escalation into Pakistan – both drones and US troops – during next summer’s fighting season.

    With the Afghan winter traditionally making guerrilla warfare harder, there is effectively one fighting season left – the summer of 2010 – before US troops may start to scale down.

    Pakistan analysts say that next summer US military planners primed for war may get increasingly frustrated they cannot bring the battle to a Taliban just sitting across the border.

    ‘In that survival game, the Taliban may cross into Pakistan. Now there is a timetable, they might just avoid combat,’ said Tanvir Ahmed Khan, a former Pakistani foreign secretary and now chairman of the Institute of Strategic Studies.

    ‘If that comes true, the Americans would be really tempted to go after them at a scale we haven’t seen before, mostly likely with drones and perhaps also with special operations.’

    Related: US diplomat escalates accusations about Al Qaeda presence in Pakistan.

    A senior US diplomat on Friday went a step further than restating Washington’s assertion about the presence of Taliban shura in Quetta and insisted that some Al Qaeda leadership could also be there.

    Pakistan authorities are also worried that the likely areas where any action would take place are high-population refugee camps.

     
  • johnpi 4:48 pm on December 3, 2009 | 0 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: Afghan Taliban, , , , Gilani, , , , , , ,

    Profiles in friendship: Pakistani PM responds to concerns about foreign fighters in FATA:

    Mr Gilani also rejected Mr Brown’s claim that three-quarters of terror plots against the UK originated in Pakistan.

    ”I don’t agree with this information because we are fighting this war on terrorism,” Mr Gilani said.

    ”Yes there have been Uzbeks, there have been Arabs, there have been Talibans from Afghanistan…. but we have been very successful and we are extremely successful.”

    He added: ”Most of them, they are not in Pakistan, they might be in Afghanistan.

    Ahmed Rashid writes in ‘Descent into Chaos’:

    Eight years after 9/11. Mullah Omar and the original Afghan Taliban Shura still live in Balochistan province. Afghan and Pakistani Taliban leaders continue to thrive in FATA where Al Qaeda also has a safe haven along with a plethora of Central Asian, European, and Arab extremist groups who are now expanding their reach into Europe, North Africa, and the Middle East.

    Nothing to see here, just move along.

     
  • johnpi 11:39 am on December 1, 2009 | 6 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: Afghan Taliban, , , Herat, , ,

    There is so much discussion in the media about violent Islamic extremism, that it obscures the other traditions and history of the faith. I was reminded of this recently while reading Ahmed Rashid’s ‘Taliban’ where he writes about the history of the city of Herat in Afghanistan before the Taliban took over.

    Herat, the heart of medieval Islam in the entire region, was a city of mosques and madrassas, but had an ancient liberal Islamic tradition. It was the home of Islamic arts and crafts, miniature painting, music, dance, carpet-making, and numerous stories about its redoubtable and beautiful women.

    Heratis still recount the story of Queen Gowhar Shad, the daughter-in-law of the conquerer Taimur who moved the Timurid capital from Samarkand to Herat in 1405 after Taimur’s death. One day in the company of 200 ‘ruby-lipped’, beautiful, ladies-in-waiting, the Queen inspected a mosque and madrassa complex she was building on the outskirts of Herat.

    The madrassa students (or taliban) had been asked to vacate the premises while the Queen and her entourage visited, but one student had fallen asleep in his room. He was awoken by an exquisitely attractive lady-in-waiting. When She rejoined the Queen, the lady was panting and dishevelled by the exertions of passionate love-making and thus she was discovered.

    (More …)

     
  • johnpi 10:32 am on December 1, 2009 | 0 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: Afghan Taliban, , , , , , , kunduz, , , , , ,

    A representative from the US’s lower house of Congress has prompted an outcry from Republicans for saying that the Bush administration ‘intentionally let bin Laden get away’ in order to justify the Iraq war.

    There’s been a lot written about foreign militants escaping from the Tora Bora area of Afghanistan in 2001, but less well known are the numbers of fighters who escaped at Kunduz at the request of Pakistan and with permission from Dick Cheney and George Bush. Ahmed Rashid writes about it in ‘Descent into Chaos.’

    For Pakistan, the stalemate in Kunduz was turning into a disaster as hundreds of ISI officers and soldiers from the Frontier Corps aiding the Taliban were trapped there.

    (More …)

     
  • johnpi 9:52 am on December 1, 2009 | 0 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: Afghan Taliban, , , , , , ,

    Bad sign: Pakistani criticism of US troop deployment shows the country is still not a partner in effort to rein in miilitants.

    Pakistani Premier Yousuf Raza Gilani says that the US’s decision to send thousands of extra troops to Afghanistan may destabilize his country.

    Gilani, in an interview with DPA, said in Islamabad on Sunday that an increase in US troops in Afghanistan is likely to lead to a spill over of militants inside Pakistan.

    The Pakistani premier’s comments are nonsensical, on a par with George W Bush for divorce from reality. Here’s what happened last month when US forces pulled out of Nuristan.

    The United States has withdrawn its troops from its four key bases in Nuristan, on the border with Pakistan, leaving the northeastern province as a safe haven for the Taliban-led insurgency to orchestrate its regional battles.
    ….

    In a telephone conversation on Wednesday, a militant linked to Rahman said that now that they had control of Nuristan, the militants are “marching towards Mohmand and Bajaur to help their fellow Taliban fighting against Pakistani troops”, referring to two tribal agencies across the border.

    NATO and the Afghans will never succeed in getting Afghanistan out of failed-state status as long as some segment of the Pakistani military and intelligence community believes militants are serving the country’s long-term security objectives.

    Pakistani military thinkers believe a Taliban state will provide them with ’strategic depth’ against India. In fact, it is Pakistan that has provided ’strategic depth’ to the Afghan Taliban against NATO.

     
  • johnpi 8:10 pm on November 30, 2009 | 0 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: Afghan Taliban, , , , , , , , , , ,

    Obama’s new policy toward Pakistan was outlined to President Zardari and the Pakistani military earlier this month in a two-page letter delivered by Obama’s national security adviser James Jones.

    Obama’s speech Tuesday night at the U.S. Military Academy at West Point, N.Y., will address primarily the Afghanistan aspects of the strategy. But despite the public and political attention focused on the number of new troops, Pakistan has been the hot core of the months-long strategy review. The long-term consequences of failure there, the review concluded, far outweigh those in Afghanistan.

    “We can’t succeed without Pakistan,” a senior administration official involved in the White House review said. “You have to differentiate between public statements and reality. There is nobody who is under any illusions about this.”

    One problem has been double-dealing with violent extremists that has long made Pakistan a state sponsor of these groups, and it appears Obama has called them out on this, a marked difference from the Bush administration where Musharraf was favored by Dick Cheney who would not allow any criticism:

    (More …)

     
  • johnpi 12:57 pm on November 30, 2009 | 9 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: Afghan Taliban, , ,

    Having just finished reading Ahmed Rashid’s newest book ‘Descent into Chaos‘, wherein he reports that nearly all of the international mass casualty terrorist plots now can be traced back or linked to the Federally Administered Tribal Areas in Pakistan – and that the Afghan insurgency is based there – I think the most interesting part of Obama’s speech on Tuesday evening will be what he has to say about Pakistan.

     
  • johnpi 7:35 pm on November 17, 2009 | 2 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: Afghan Taliban, , Najibullah, , , , , , , ,

    Last we checked in on the Swat Valley, women were reveling in the removal of Taliban restrictions while suspected Taliban supporters were being tortured and lynched by locals or receviing much the same from the military. As one embittered hotel owner in Swat said, “Even the Israelis have not done such bad things to the Palestinians as the Taliban did to us.”

    Now the leader of the Swat Taliban has reappeared in Afghanistan, and he’s promising vengeance.

    “I have reached Afghanistan safely,” Maulana Fazlullah told BBC Urdu.

    “We are soon going to launch full-fledged punitive raids against the army in Swat.”
    ….

    He issued a warning to the North West Frontier Province’s information minister Mian Iftikhar Hussain.

    “The authorities should beware, especially Mian Iftikhar Hussain, whose fate will be like that of Najibullah,” he warned, referring to Dr Najibullah who was Afghan president before the Taliban hanged him in 1996 when they took Kabul.

    Najibullah* was tortured, castrated and executed without trial by the Afghan Taliban in 1996, after which his body was dragged through the streets and hung from a lamp post.

    * Juan Cole today linked an article by a UN official who spent some time visiting with Najibullah just before the Taliban killed him. The official asked Najibullah if he regretted the blood on his hands from his time serving as head of the Afghan secret police under the communists.

    “Dear Alan, do not be naïve about what you are facing. They will bring a destruction you cannot imagine.”

    His message to me, at our New Year meeting in 1995, was one of no regrets for whatever he had done to stand against the Islamists. He was absolutely clear about that; he would do it again.

     
  • johnpi 10:13 pm on November 14, 2009 | 0 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: Afghan Taliban, , , , ,

    Time capsule: Pakistan 1999. Here’s what Ahmed Rashid was writing about Pakistan exactly 10 years ago this month.

    The Taliban’s purist ideology and the Pakistani recruits it has nurtured have had immense cross-border repercussions in Pakistan. An already fragile nation in the midst of an identity crisis, economic meltdown, ethnic and sectarian division, and suffering under a rapacious ruling elite unable to provide good governance, Pakistan could easily be submerged by a new Islamist wave led not by established, more mature Islamist parties but by neo-Taliban groups.

    By 1998, such neo-Taliban parties had become a major influence in the Pakistani provinces of Baluchistan and the North West Frontier Province. In those regions, they had begun banning television and videos, imposing sharia punishments such as stoning and amputation, assassinating Pakistani Shiites, and forcing women to adopt the restrictive Taliban dress code. Their influence is now starting to creep outside the Pushtun belt to Punjab and Sind. Of the 6,000-8,000 militants who joined the Taliban for their July 1999 offensive against the Northern Alliance, the majority were, for the first time, not Pushtuns but Punjabis. The Pakistani government’s support for the Taliban is thus coming back to haunt it, even as Pakistan’s leaders remain oblivious of the danger and continue their support.

     
  • johnpi 9:21 am on November 9, 2009 | 0 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: Afghan Taliban, ,

    NATO, Afghans claim to kill 130 Taliban in Kunduz.

    NATO and Afghan officials claimed on Monday their forces had killed at least 130 Taliban fighters in a major operation over the past week in an area of Afghanistan’s north where militant activity has surged.

     
  • johnpi 9:22 am on November 8, 2009 | 7 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: Afghan Taliban, , , , , , , , , ,

    Reading Pakistani journalist Ahmed Rashid’s “Taliban” the much-praised book about the ’student movement’ that was published just prior to Sept. 11th.

    An observation: It’s interesting to note how different the Taliban are as an Islamic movement in control of a population from other Islamic movements with similar responsibilities. Hizbollah and Hamas essentially made their names and established their ’street credibilty’ through focus on social welfare and improving a population’s well-being.

    Hamas funds schools, orphanages, mosques, healthcare clinics, soup kitchens, and sports leagues. “Approximately 90 percent of its work is in social, welfare, cultural, and educational activities,” writes the Israeli scholar Reuven Paz. The Palestinian Authority often fails to provide such services, and Hamas’s efforts in this area—as well as a reputation for honesty, in contrast to the many Fatah officials accused of corruption—help to explain the broad popularity it summoned to defeat Fatah in the PA’s recent elections.

    The Taliban, in contrast, were distinct for their extraordinary lack of interest in the social welfare of the populations it came to control. Here’s Rashid’s description of events after the Taliban kicked the NGOs out of Kabul in the summer of 1998:

    With more than half of Kabul’s 1.2 million people benefiting in some way from NGO handouts, women and children were immediate victims when aid was cut off. Food distribution, health care and and the city’s fragile water distribution network were all seriously affected. As people waved empty kettles and buckets at passing Taliban jeeps, their reply to the population was characteristic of their lack of social concern. “We Muslims believe God the Almighty will feed everybody one way or another.”

    Since the Taliban had dubbed Mullah Omar Amir of all Muslims, not just Afghans – demonstrating transnationalist aspirations – I guess they felt they could use the ‘royal we.’ Tagging this post ‘Muslim-on-Muslim violence’ since the Kabul victims of Taliban indifference were probably all Muslims.

     
  • johnpi 3:02 pm on November 7, 2009 | 1 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: Afghan Taliban, , , , , ,

    Pakistan rumor mill: Taliban militants are actually a US/Indian proxy army trying to destabilize the country.

    The government and military aren’t doing much to squelch the rumors – probably because they have a singularly significant responsibility for the creation and growth of the Taliban.

     
  • johnpi 2:55 pm on October 28, 2009 | 3 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: Afghan Taliban, , , , , ,

    Taliban take over Afghan province of Nuristan after US withdrawal. Militants now “marching towards Mohmand and Bajaur to help their fellow Taliban fighting against Pakistani troops.”

    The United States has withdrawn its troops from its four key bases in Nuristan, on the border with Pakistan, leaving the northeastern province as a safe haven for the Taliban-led insurgency to orchestrate its regional battles.
    ….

    The province is now under the effective control of the network belonging to Qari Ziaur Rahman, a Taliban commander with strong ties to Bin Laden. This makes Nuristan the first Afghan province to be controlled by a network inspired by al-Qaeda.

    In a telephone conversation on Wednesday, a militant linked to Rahman said that now that they had control of Nuristan, the militants are “marching towards Mohmand and Bajaur to help their fellow Taliban fighting against Pakistani troops”, referring to two tribal agencies across the border.

    Rahman is not the son of a legendary mujahideen commander, but of a cleric named Maulana Dilbar. His ties do not lie with Pakistan, but with Bin Laden, having instructed him in the lessons of the Prophet Mohammed’s life.

    Ziaur, in his early thirties, was raised in the camps of Arab militants, who instilled in him the passion to fight against the Americans – not only in Afghanistan, but across the globe. Ziaur did not get his command as any hereditary right. First he had to prove himself on the battlefield, which he did by taking on US troops in Kunar and Nuristan provinces. He was the first to mount operations against the US in the Karghal district of Kunar and he engineered encounters in Nuristan.

     
  • johnpi 8:22 pm on October 23, 2009 | 0 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: Afghan Taliban, , , , Jundallah, Jundollah, , , , , ,

    Over at the Reuter’s Pakistan blog, some disdain is thrown at the report of a rift between Al Qaeda and the Taliban, but also an acknowledgement of the frequency of infighting among the various groups. Finally, a scorecard of the various groups operating in the “Af-Pak” region.

    Such reports of rifts are impossible to verify and may be deliberately designed to confuse – the talk of a break between Mullah Omar and al Qaeda comes as the United States has talked of stepping up pressure on the ”Quetta shura”, named after the capital of Pakistan’s Baluchistan province, where Washington says the Afghan Taliban are based. Islamabad says Mullah Omar is not in Pakistan.

    But history would suggest that the Islamist militants do not always form a cohesive whole or even follow a common ideology. After the Soviet Union withdrew from Afghanistan in 1989, the mujahideen who had driven them out became fragmented, leading to a bloody civil war. In Kashmir too, where a separatist revolt began in 1989, different militant groups rivalled and sometimes fought each other.

     
  • johnpi 11:44 pm on October 22, 2009 | 3 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: Afghan Taliban, , ,

    Online arguments break out between Al Qaeda and the Taliban over competing ‘nationalisms.’

    Beginning with a statement from Mullah Omar in September, the Afghan Taliban’s Quetta-based leadership has been emphasizing the “nationalist” character of their movement, and has sent several communications to Afghanistan’s neighbors expressing an intent to establish positive international relations.

    In what are increasingly being viewed by the forums as direct rejoinders to these sentiments, recent messages from al-Qa’ida have pointedly rejected the “national” model of revolutionary Islamism and reiterated calls for jihad against Afghanistan’s neighbors, especially Pakistan and China. However interpreted, these conflicting signals raise serious questions about the notion of an al-Qa’ida-Taliban merger.

    ….

    [O]ne thing is clear: the recent shift in the Quetta Shura’s strategic communications is not to al-Qa’ida’s liking, and it is raising serious concerns among the broader Salafi jihadi movement about the religio-political legitimacy of the Afghan Taliban’s leadership.

    I say ‘competing nationalisms’ because Al Qaeda is championing the global caliphate, which for all effects and purposes is another ‘nationalism’ competing for the same loyalty.

     
c
compose new post
j
next post/next comment
k
previous post/previous comment
r
reply
e
edit
o
show/hide comments
t
go to top
esc
cancel