Updates from islamoyankee RSS Toggle Comment Threads | Keyboard Shortcuts

  • islamoyankee 8:16 am on August 3, 2010 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: ,   

    I recently posted about the American Ahmadi Community attempting to create a bad Muslim/good Muslim dichotomy, where they are the good Muslims. Their response in comments actually seems to reinforce my thesis.

    Leaders in the Ahmadi Muslim Community (AMC) are making a play to rectify the absence of a centralized leadership body for the Muslim-American community by positioning themselves as the leaders of the community.

    Unfortunately, their approach appears to be based on a Good Muslim/Bad Muslim dichotomy that actually ends up hurting the Muslim-American community.

     
    • shams 8:20 am on August 3, 2010 Permalink | Reply

      good muslims are maftoons or dead, bad muslims are all other muslims.
      kind of like Amerindians.

  • islamoyankee 7:35 am on February 10, 2010 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , ,   

    In keeping up with our fascination with all things Taqwacore, I want mention my roundtable with the Kominas and interview with Michael Muhammad Knight are both up are Religion Dispatches.

     
  • islamoyankee 4:13 pm on November 11, 2009 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , ,   

    Over at my blog I have a video regarding Muslim American views on violence against their neighbors. I did not want to embed it here because I was not sure of the etiquette around Flash movies on the front page.

     
    • aziz 5:31 pm on November 11, 2009 Permalink | Reply

      embedding movies is fine, if you can get it to work, which I havent for some reason. more on teh To Do list :P

  • islamoyankee 4:11 pm on November 11, 2009 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: Ft. Hood   

    My thoughts on Ft. Hood over at Religion Dispatches.

    It’s quite possible that Hasan is mentally ill and chose to use Islam to express that illness the way a Christian may believe he’s hearing the voice of Jesus. In both cases they are turning to comfortable cultural idioms to express the confusion in their heads.

    The following paragraph was cut from the final version, a decision I do agree with. However, I am thinking of picking up the thread and am curious to hear your thoughts.

    One concrete action we can take is to reach out to Hasan’s student, Duane Reasoner, who believes ““In the Koran, you’re not supposed to have alliances with Jews or Christian or others, and if you are killed in the military fighting against Muslims, you will go to hell.”” He is clearly misguided in his understanding of the Qur’an. The first part he is referring to is verse 5:52, which refers to Christians and Jews who broke a treaty with Muhammad in Medina. The second is verse 4:92, which states a believer shall not kill a believer. According to the Constitution of Medina, a believer can include Jews and Christians. However, even if one accepts Reasoner’s understanding that the verse only refers to Muslims, he still has a problem. The greatest killer of Muslims in the 21st century has been the Taliban and Al-Qa’ida. The Sunni-Shi’ah conflict in Iraq is another violation of the Qur’an. Reasoner must either put himself in the position of deciding who is Muslim, or accept that as problematic as US intervention in Iraq and Afghanistan has been, it has probably also saved a large number of Muslim lives. Reasoner needs help, and he needs it now.

    I do want to make it clear that the above is not meant as a defense of the invasion of Iraq; the quote is slightly out of context. So please focus on the main point of reaching out to Reasoner.

     
    • aziz 5:41 pm on November 11, 2009 Permalink | Reply

      YES! thank you. i was looking for this on email earlier and could not find it.

    • AA 5:58 pm on November 11, 2009 Permalink | Reply

      The one narrative I see coming out of the Muslim response is that there are lot of people ‘angry’ at many things wrong with a post 9/11 America. Well, Americans are angry too, and those who get angered, usually look for excuses to dump their anger (shadows) on others.

      Anyways, I don’t necessarily have a unique view or claim to know the answers. But I find these two read relevant. The first one is relevant to the practical level, how the elected representative should lead (versus what the crowd may wish), and the second is more on the deeper level, an analysis of our over-identification with religion, nationalism, etc. People take their religiosity too personally (taking it seriously is another matter, but IMHO, the root cause lies in us taking religion too personally).

      1 – (someone has posted this here earlier, I think it’s the best practical narrative).
      http://lynch.foreignpolicy.com/posts/2009/11/09/al_qaedas_master_plan

      2 – Psychological assessment of [over]identification.
      http://docs.google.com/View?id=dgdtpw6r_186hktf6gdd

    • Buzz 6:00 pm on November 11, 2009 Permalink | Reply

      This topic has been reviewed a little in a thread Aziz started about whether it is Islamically ethical to be involved in the US Military. You raise some of the troubling questions and highlight the problematic nature of such an ethical question. It is far from black and white.

      Do things change if the US Military supports Bosnian Muslims or enter into a military cooperation with Yemen?

      While Muslims must support each other, do Muslims also have an obligation to support the society in which they dwell and prosper (as opposed to displaced refuges who may have never really joined their host country’s society)? And so forth.

      The righteous caliph of the Muslim empire, to whom devotion and allegiance are due, does not exist. I think most Muslim who feel reticence about serving in a Western military express nationalist ideals more than Islamic ones. And if one can make the argument that serving in a Western military is unethical, it would seem that the same argument can be made to not participate in Western society at all. Who is to say that a programmer or a green grocer in the west does less than military personel in contributing to ‘western hegemony.’

      • null 12:52 am on November 12, 2009 Permalink | Reply

        I guess what you’re saying is that being in the west is a package deal. You can’t just decide that you want the freedom and democracy, but hold the bombastic foreign policy please. There’s probably some truth in this.

        I can only speak for myself, but I don’t feel that not participating in a western Army comes out of “anti-western” feelings. It comes out of knowing that in any modern war there are huge numbers in the way of “collateral damage”, and I don’t want blood on my hands. I support my country by being good, and wanting it to be good. Quaint, but true. In the same way I would boycott an unethical company – no matter how much good it was doing for the economy – by not working for/buying from them, I choose to distance myself from the military complex as much as I can.

        • Buzz 1:06 am on November 12, 2009 Permalink | Reply

          but I don’t feel that not participating in a western Army comes out of “anti-western” feelings.

          I predicted that sentiment but forgot to account for it.
          Obviously, not every Muslim gets in or has to apply for military service. But the army, like government and all strata of society requires representation. The way to make the western military more Muslim friendly is by participation in the highest ranks.

          Still, I also see your position as additionally valid.

  • islamoyankee 12:15 pm on June 30, 2009 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: ,   

    My anti-torture statement for the ACLU is here.

     
  • islamoyankee 12:15 pm on June 10, 2009 Permalink | Reply
    Tags:   

    March tomorrow, June 11, 2009, in front of the White House as a Religious Witness Against Torture. In the “credit where credit is due” department, ISNA is participating.

     
  • islamoyankee 8:38 am on June 10, 2009 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: Columbia University, , , , Salam Al-Mayarati   

    Juan Cole will be speaking at Columbia on June 11, 2009 at 7PM. Event is free, but RSVP is needed.

    Details here. RSVP here.

     
  • islamoyankee 7:33 am on April 1, 2009 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , masturbation   

    Iranians suggest Masturbation for Allergies

    Not an April Fool’s Day joke.

     
  • islamoyankee 6:55 pm on March 29, 2009 Permalink | Reply
    Tags:   

    RD: Why Torture Needs You.

     
  • islamoyankee 6:50 pm on March 29, 2009 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , ,   

    US State Dept. is expanding digital presence.

     
  • islamoyankee 5:48 pm on March 29, 2009 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , ,   

    Shuruq Event (NYU): Iran, Palestine, & the U.S.: Re-Shaping Foreign Policy in the Middle East

    Monday, March 30th -Panel Discussion : Iran, Palestine, & the U.S.: Re-Shaping Foreign Policy in the Middle East
    7:00pm – 10:00pm
    Kimmel Center Eisner and Lubin Auditorium , 60 Washington Square South, 4th Floor, New York, NY 10012

    Panelists:
    Dr. Hatem Bazian
    Dr. Richard Bulliet

    The goal for the event is to outline the underlying issues facing the United States in the Middle East and greater Muslim world in a post-Bush era. Do Middle Eastern leaders feel President Obama is a viable leader and ally in establishing diplomatic relations in the region, or will he carry on the status quo of US foreign policy from the previous presidency? Can President Obama effectively influence leaders to manage internal strife (Iraq, Israel and Palestine, etc.)?

    The event will be held on Monday March 30, 2009, from 6:30PM to 9PM at the Kimmel Center of Student Life. Both speakers will have speak individually and then attendees will be able to ask questions in a Q&A session. This event is co-sponsored by the United Muslims Association and Shuruq 2009

    Co-sponsored by the United Muslims Association, The Kevorkian Center for Near Eastern Studies, Arab Students United and Shuruq 2009
    ______________________________________________________-
    For seven years now, Shuruq (Arabic for Sunrise) has been a celebration of Islam’s rich diversity. Shuruq raises awareness of Islam and Muslims in an experiential way, through emphasis on lived realities and artistic expressions, working to build an attitude of harmony and mutual understanding within the New York City community. For two weeks every year, Shuruq puts together a series of increasingly popular events on NYU’s campus to highlight the breadth of culture, music, literature, religion and politics throughout the Muslim world — including America’s millions of Muslims.

    Shuruq 2009 will host a number of events across campus in the next two weeks, bringing to the University and to the City a chance to hear from, learn and engage with noted activists, academics, performers and American Muslims leaders. This represents for many New Yorkers an excellent opportunity to understand American Islam, where it has come from and where it is going.

    For a complete listing of this year’s events, please visit the Shuruq 2009 homepage

     
    • K.Z. 12:13 am on March 30, 2009 Permalink | Reply

      There is a lot going on in the Muslim community today including the introduction of some novel theological and political ideas, Part of this can be explained by native elites assimilating to their colonial masters, but other parts are systematic:

      Transnational NGOs in the Creation of a New Islam

      REPORT US MUSLIM ENGAGEMENT INGRID MATTSON, HAMZA YUSUF: Destroying the Old Islam follow PDF LINK

  • islamoyankee 9:48 am on March 29, 2009 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: ,   

    Osama and Orientalism, my latest over at Religion Dispatches.

     
    • plimfix 3:06 am on March 30, 2009 Permalink | Reply

      IMHO, any “Renaissance” needs to include a much wider remit than “a rebirth of the scholarly class as arbiters of interpretation”. Armies of MEN with Dars-i-Nizamis? – you don’t mean that, I hope. After all, the Ulema have done a pretty good job of defending orthodoxies (Zaman, 2002). I would like to see a (post-imperial) cultural, intellectual, scholastic and popular Muslim “Renaissance”. Insha Allah.

  • islamoyankee 9:45 am on March 29, 2009 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: intrafaith, ,   

    Tabsir points out an article about New Age Islam, a site that challenges ideologic interpretations of Islam.

     
  • islamoyankee 8:38 pm on February 18, 2009 Permalink | Reply
    Tags:   

    Aasiya Zubair was brutally murdered last week. There is a FaceBook group dedicated to her and to stopping domestic violence, as well as group that is calling on all imams to offer khutbas (sermons) against DV this Friday.

    My piece.

    Aziz.

    Arsalan.

    Asma.

    Razib. (the discussion is really good)

    (cross-posted from islamicate)

     
  • islamoyankee 12:37 pm on February 17, 2009 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , ,   

    I’ll be speaking at a conference in May 2009 at Riverside Church in NY. The event is called “Forensic Scriptures: What the Qur’an Reveals about the Bible.” If you are in the area and would like to attend, you can enter “Friend of Hussein Rashid” under the “position” field to receive a $100 discount on the registration page. Make sure you also check the “affiliate” price.

     
  • islamoyankee 10:45 am on February 6, 2009 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: ,   

    The folks over at Muslims for Progressive Values have a petition up regarding domestic violence. Take a look. Sign if you are so inclined. Spread the word if it strikes you. No pun intended.

     
  • islamoyankee 10:43 am on February 6, 2009 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , Parliament of World's Religions   

    Over at islamicate I have the details for call for proposals for the upcoming Parliament of World’s Religions. Deadline is Feb. 28.

     
  • islamoyankee 6:52 am on January 25, 2009 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , MLT, MLT 2009   

    Wajahat Ali has written up a nice piece on the special session of the Doha Debates held during the recent Muslim Leaders of Tomorrow Conference. He has quoted me and given me permission to post the original questions and my responses, which are at islamicate.

     
  • islamoyankee 2:41 pm on January 22, 2009 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: ,   

    After the Battle of Uhud, it is narrated that the Angel Jibrail came down and gave the well-known declaration: “There is no hero but Ali, there is no sword but Dhulfiqar.”

    In light of that, and to turn to the stories of the sahaba, rather than modern thought or the intellect God gave us, I thought of these two stories. The first is from Rumi (although surviving the Mongol invasion may make him a bit of an effete faqih):

    (More …)

     
    • aziz 1:54 am on January 23, 2009 Permalink | Reply

      live like Ali; die like Husain

      amin

    • historylover 7:34 am on January 23, 2009 Permalink | Reply

      An incident similar to that to that of \”Stranger\” is attributed Umar (R.A)

    • Jake 4:11 am on July 3, 2009 Permalink | Reply

      Ali ibn Abi Talib (a.s) failed in his duty.. to anyone???????????? this sounds like another made up hadith wrongly attributed to Imam Ali (a.s). As the last commentator states, it’s been attributed to Umar as well.. ’nuff said!!

    • Buzz Kill 12:54 pm on July 3, 2009 Permalink | Reply

      The lives and stories of saints are not supposed to be analyzed in this way. “It was Umar not Ali.” “She had three children not four.” “It was fish he brought, not lamb.” What does it matter? Most of these stories have a hint of excess and hyperbole in them. Do you really think any soldier had the time to pontificate in the middle of a battle?

      They are only supposed to be inspiring and encourage the higher nafs.

    • Jake 2:37 am on July 6, 2009 Permalink | Reply

      Heyyy.. there’s a thought..wot is the point of analysing history?? let’s all go along the principle of twisting history according to our own opinions as long as it inspires and encourages the higher nafs!! Let’s just shove fact right out of the door!! Let’s make up our own characterististics of personalities as we see fit!! Let’s fit events according to our own imagination!! let’s just make up events and attriribute them to any personality!! wadda ya say??

      • Buzz Kill 8:25 am on July 6, 2009 Permalink | Reply

        That is basically what you call “religion?”
        History is something completely different,

        Idealizing history is religion.,

    • Jake 8:38 am on July 13, 2009 Permalink | Reply

      “idealising history is religion”??? wot a load of tosh!! wot are u smoking buzz kill?? coz wotever it is, it aint working!!!

      • Buzz Kill 11:28 am on July 13, 2009 Permalink | Reply

        How do you know until you tried it? Maybe it is working great.

        Anyway, if you take your standard religion ( I am not talking about reality here, I am talking about the mass hysteria we call orthodox religion, fundamentalism, evangelism, etc) you have a central figure, you take his or her life story, leave out parts that conflict with your premise, emphasize and twist the other stuff to support your premise.

        This is how we kill in the name of religion. And all the other horrible stuff.

        You have a problem with that? Tell it to you know WHO (pointing upwards)

    • Jake 7:15 am on July 15, 2009 Permalink | Reply

      How very patronising of u buzz kill. Yes I do have a problem with that: u turning a discussion from one point to another, a case of moving the goal posts. It started with u suggesting that it’s Ok to twist events as long as it “inspires and encourages the higher nafs” to a discussion of how ppl use/abuse belief for their own personal agenda/purpose. Stick to one thing at a time. And nope u aint gonna get that philsopher’s degree. “Aaaaahhh little clicket sayings of Buzz Kill he says…” :)

      • Buzz Kill 11:49 am on July 15, 2009 Permalink | Reply

        Jake, you are too easily upset. I was not trying to be patronizing, I was only making a point. There is no disconnection between someone who takes the life of a holy person and retells it according to their own idea of what was honorable and praiseworthy
        and
        someone who has their own agenda and uses the lives of Propjets and Saints to further their own agenda.

        I am just being a little more open and honest about it.

        You could say that this phenomenon totally explains the degradation of religion from inspiration to ritual and tradition. And it totally encapsulates the saying, “The road to hell is paved with good intentions.”

        • Buzz Kill 12:16 pm on July 15, 2009 Permalink | Reply

          There was a Sufi’s book, Shah Maghsoud I think, I was reading recently and they were discussing Plato’s Dialogues. They said, when Plato describes Socrates, his wisdom and his actions, actually Plato is describing himself.

          This is not necessarily a bad thing. It depends on the intellect and righteousness of the mind of the reteller. But there is no getting around the fact that we get further and further from the actual subject (the reality of the historical figure).

    • Crabby 3:32 am on July 16, 2009 Permalink | Reply

      I think the second story about Ali is morally antiquated. I prefer this report of Ali, very manly indeed, found in Kamali’s “Freedom, Equality and Justice in Islam” where he referenced Ali Abd al-Wahid Wafi’s “Huquq al-Insan fi’l Islam”:

      Ali, it is reported, had a dispute with a Jew whom he took to a court where Umar was presiding. Umar addressed the Jew by his name but called Ali, out of respect, by his appellation Abu al-Hasan. This invoked Ali’s displeasure, and when Umar asked Ali whether he was unhappy because he had to attend the court with a Jew, Ali replied that on the contrary he was unhappy because Umar had not accorded equal treatment since there was discrepancy in the tone of the address and the choice of the litigants titles used.

  • islamoyankee 9:38 pm on January 8, 2009 Permalink | Reply
    Tags:   

    No US veto.

    UN Story

    NYT

     
  • islamoyankee 9:43 am on December 29, 2008 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , ,   

    Aziz was kind enough to open up City of Brass to me for a quick visit. I wrote a post on Ashura.

     
  • islamoyankee 9:41 am on December 29, 2008 Permalink | Reply
    Tags:   

    I am updating with resources on the Gaza crisis at islamicate.

     
  • islamoyankee 4:50 pm on December 26, 2008 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: ChangeTheStory   

    I just want to mention Change the Story. It’s a project that I think needs some more publicity.

     
  • islamoyankee 3:55 pm on December 26, 2008 Permalink | Reply  

    Salaam alaykum to all. I have recently been given the keys to a fiefdom in the kingdom, and wanted to take a moment to introduce myself.

    I blog under “islamoyankee,” but was born Hussein Rashid. My normal blog is islamicate, and recently at The Devil’s Advocate. Although I anticipate most of my regular blogging will continue at those two sites, I look forward to relying on this community to help my own understanding of Islam and Muslims. I am really enjoying the Salafi/Wahhabi discussion and the rather engrossing Progressive Islam discussion.

    Many thanks again for having me, and I look forward to being part of this community.

     
c
compose new post
j
next post/next comment
k
previous post/previous comment
r
reply
e
edit
o
show/hide comments
t
go to top
l
go to login
h
show/hide help
shift + esc
cancel