The Taliban movement in Afghanistan, when it controlled large parts of the north and west of that country in the 1990s, had a goal of “forced reIslamization” (Rashid’s phrase) toward the other ethnic peoples they gained control over in placed like Herat and Mazar-e-Sharif. The “correct” practice they sought to instill in local populations was – of course – Wahhabi-Salafism.
So can “forced reIslamization” work? the answer is ‘yes,’ and it’s been done before – in Saudi Arabia. But it comes with a price, and by looking at the Saudi-Wahhabi project we can estimate and make some projections.
Khalid Abou El Fadl writes about it in The Great Theft.
…the various Wahhabi rebellions in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries were very bloody, as the Wahhabis indiscriminately slaughtered Muslims especially those belonging to Sufi orders and the Shi’i sect. In 1802, for example, the Wahhabis executed a large number of Sunnis in Mecca and Medina, whom they considered for one reason or another heretical. The number of those executed or massacred by the Saudi-Wahhabi alliance has never been counted, but from historical accounts it is clear that it is in the tens of thousands if not more. In the course of the second conquest of the Arabian peninsula, for instance, acting under orders from Ibn Sa’ud, the Wahhabis carried out 40,000 public executions and 350,000 amputations.
So what would be the comparable figures for executions and amputations today in Afghanistan? I’m going to have to make a few assumptions here, but follow along.
The population of Afghanistan today is roughly equivalent to that of Saudi Arabia – around 28 million. The Saudi population was probably around 3 million in the 1800s. Assuming Afghanstan’s population has always been close to Saudi Arabia’s, we can set up simple equations:
40,000 is to 3 million as ? is to 28 million. And,
350,000 is to 3 million as ? is to 28 million.
Among today’s population in Afghanistan, if the Taliban executed an equivalent proportion of the population for heresy that number would be 373,333.
An equivalent proportion of amputations among the currently living Afghan population would be approximately 3.2 million.
El Fadl refers to these figures as only accounting for those slain in the “second conquest,” most likely the “heretical Sunnis.” So we should probably double these numbers (at least) to capture the slain and disfigured Sufi and Shia.
So there you have it: The price in lives would be over a half million, and the cost in amputations would be more than 6 million, following the historical Saudi model of ‘forced reIslamization.’

bdr 4:53 pm on December 6, 2009 Permalink |
Is it really accurate to label Taliban as ‘Salafi-Wahhabi’ [sic]? Isn’t Deobandi more correct?
johnpi 6:41 pm on December 6, 2009 Permalink |
I didn’t. The comparison I’m seeking is of the efforts and aspirations of the Taliban to accomplish a ‘forced reIslamization’ (who are certainly under the influence of Wahabbi thinking if not Wahabbi themselves) as compared to the historical model of it we have in Saudi Arabia.
But it would also be incorrect to leave the Deobandi assertion in place. Rather than summarize and condense, here are some primary sources and links (pardon the text dump).
See here.
And here.
And here.
And here again.
Conrad Barwa 7:03 pm on December 6, 2009 Permalink |
According to Peter Marsden and some other observers who worked in Afghanistan at the time; the Taliban were uneven in how they applied their strictures; apparently they were a lot more flexible in places like Kandahar, Helmand and the south but were much harsher in the major urban areas outside this region, especially Kabul, which many of the younger Talib recruits were trained to regard as some sort of Sodom/Gomorrah. There seems to have been some realisation later on, by the leadership that many of the younger recruits got carried away in their zealousness. There was also quite a lot of uneveness in how rules were applied, as many Talib commanders and officials were rotated frequently from districts outside their core bases.
To what degree this actually made a difference on the ground I don’t know, but it is worth bearing in mind.