Charles Johnson of Little Green Footballs goes rogue and follows deansworld in reassessing their ties with the conservative right, especially in light of the “anti-Islamic bigotry that goes far beyond simply criticizing radical Islam…”
Pro-Israel blogger breaks with right wing
By Eric Fingerhut · December 2, 2009Longtime pro-Israel blogger Charles Johnson of the popular Little Green Footballs site has “parted ways with the Right” and writes that he can be called an independent. In a post on his blog earlier this week, Johnson, a critic of radical Islam, wrote that among his reasons was “anti-Islamic bigotry that goes far beyond simply criticizing radical Islam, into support for fascism, violence, and genocide.” Other problems with the right, he said, was “support for anti-science bad craziness” and “hatred for President Obama that goes far beyond simply criticizing his policies, into racism, hate speech, and bizarre conspiracy theories (see: witch doctor pictures, tea parties, Birthers, Michelle Malkin, Fox News, World Net Daily, Newsmax, and every other right wing source).”
Johnson, who is not Jewish, doesn’t seem to have changed his strong support for Israel, which he talked about back in 2004 in this interview with Arutz Sheva. His official break with the Right had been coming for a while — as this April Washington Independent piece notes:
Since the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, jazz musician and Web designer Charles Johnson has devoted his blog, Little Green Footballs, to exposing Muslim extremism in and outside the United States. His targets have included the Council on American-Islamic Relations, filmmaker Michael Moore, Reuters, Sen. John Kerry (D-Mass.), Dan Rather, and the late pro-Palestinian activist Rachel Corrie — who some LGF commenters (not Johnson) call “St. Pancake,” a tribute to the Israeli steamroller that killed her. LGF helped write the lexicon of the self-styled “anti-Jihadist” blogosphere — from “moonbat” (”an unthinking or insane leftist”) to “anti-idiotarian” (”anyone who grasps the significance of and does his or her best to combat the post-9/11 political alliance between the ‘Old Left’ and militant Islam”).
But in the early days of Barack Obama’s presidency, LGF has become better known for the various fights it picks with many on the right — including conservative bloggers, critics of Islamic extremism, and critics of Islam in general who used to be Johnson’s fellow travelers. ….
“I don’t think I’ve changed,” Johnson said. “I’ve always been pretty independent. This is something I’ve really tried to put out there on my blog. I don’t consider myself right-wing.”

shams 7:31 am on December 3, 2009 Permalink |
Charles’ initial fracture with the right came over creationism/IDT….at the time that the movie Exposed came out. I think it mught be instructive to look at the common theme that turned John Cole, Johnson, and yours truly (snowcrash ref). Schiavo, creationism, and stem cell research are discussions where one side (the other side) is rooted in incontrovertable scientific fact. The conservative position on science is often simply WRONG. Schiavo was a human carrot, creationism/IDT is anti-scientific crapology, and Bush flagrantly lied about eSCR on the expansion veto to manipulate the low information republican base.
6% of scientists are republicans…..9% are conservative.
There is a reason that conservatism appears to be deeply anti-scientific……it is.
Conservatism resists experimentation in progress…but advances in scientific knowledge are ALREADY tested….that is how science works.
Once a core tenent of a belief system is fractured….say, “Presidents don’t lie”, the belief structure collapses, and inconsistancies and irregularities that could be smoothed over with cognitive dissonance or denailism before become glaring and obvious structural faults.
shams 7:36 am on December 3, 2009 Permalink |
Dean remains a conservative on science….he is a terribot.
shams 7:38 am on December 3, 2009 Permalink |
I’m agnostic on Deans HIV denialism….I haven’t read anything current about that.
Buzz 11:59 am on December 3, 2009 Permalink |
I think these little steps show how radical the right has become. Normal people can’t be associated anymore. That spells the eventual end of this horrible movement.
shams 12:26 pm on December 3, 2009 Permalink |
I think the rise of the Third Culture dooms conservatism as a movement.
In the 21st century, conservatism is less and less relevent as a philosophy.
shams 12:26 pm on December 3, 2009 Permalink |
Conservatism is obsolete.
Buzz 12:34 pm on December 3, 2009 Permalink |
In the Islamic world too?
shams 1:05 pm on December 3, 2009 Permalink
yup, eventually….any philosophy dependent on “traditional wisdom” is going to be degraded by the flattening of information in the end.
dar ul Islam will lag until it catches up in information technology.
shams 1:09 pm on December 3, 2009 Permalink
its like….when i talked about oral tradition and memetic hygiene of sacred texts….the interwebs eventually make everyone a scholar, everyone a sage.
Can’t stop the signal.
Buzz 1:24 pm on December 3, 2009 Permalink
We all sit in Shaykh Google’s circle.
DavId Anthony Hohol 3:28 am on December 4, 2009 Permalink |
I was recently fired for being too critical of Israel…. we need more people like this gentleman to help spread the truth. Details at
http://www.relativityonline.com/from-the-editor/battle-lines/
Buzz 4:16 am on December 4, 2009 Permalink |
As a Canadian, perhaps you are unaware that ANY criticism of Israel or Jews is damned near taboo in American media. Donklephant is simply abiding by this cruel and unfortunate code.
We are all getting tired of it, Walt and Mearsheimer, you, me, Obama.
Time to change the game. Sorry about your job.