<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The spokesman for the American Family As&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://talkislam.info/2009/11/09/the-spokesman-for-the-american-family-as/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://talkislam.info/2009/11/09/the-spokesman-for-the-american-family-as/</link>
	<description>a crescent waxing eloquent</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 11:18:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: aziz</title>
		<link>http://talkislam.info/2009/11/09/the-spokesman-for-the-american-family-as/#comment-18082</link>
		<dc:creator>aziz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 22:02:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://talkislam.info/2009/11/09/the-spokesman-for-the-american-family-as/#comment-18082</guid>
		<description>likewise, at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.redstate.com/streiff/2009/11/06/the-legacy-of-major-nidal-malik-hasan/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;RedState&lt;/a&gt;:

&lt;blockquote&gt;One of the enduring fallacies of the Bush Administration’s prosecution of the War on Terror was the refusal to admit that islam was neither peaceful in nature nor a disinterested observer in the war. This is not to say that all muslims are members of al-Qaeda, but to blithely ignore the religious dimension of the war was simply wrongheaded. To continue to ignore the particular vulnerability of muslim troops and officers to the propaganda on the grounds and label that very unremarkable observation as being racist or xenophobic is a fatal error. As we saw yesterday at Fort Hood. &lt;/blockquote&gt;

an &quot;unremarkable&quot; observation, eh? reminds me of the quote about the banality of evil.

btw please add &quot;conservatives&quot; and &quot;conservatism&quot; to the tags</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>likewise, at <a href="http://www.redstate.com/streiff/2009/11/06/the-legacy-of-major-nidal-malik-hasan/" rel="nofollow">RedState</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>One of the enduring fallacies of the Bush Administration’s prosecution of the War on Terror was the refusal to admit that islam was neither peaceful in nature nor a disinterested observer in the war. This is not to say that all muslims are members of al-Qaeda, but to blithely ignore the religious dimension of the war was simply wrongheaded. To continue to ignore the particular vulnerability of muslim troops and officers to the propaganda on the grounds and label that very unremarkable observation as being racist or xenophobic is a fatal error. As we saw yesterday at Fort Hood. </p></blockquote>
<p>an &#8220;unremarkable&#8221; observation, eh? reminds me of the quote about the banality of evil.</p>
<p>btw please add &#8220;conservatives&#8221; and &#8220;conservatism&#8221; to the tags</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
