Salafism: A new threat to Hamas.
On the streets of Rafah in the southern Gaza Strip, clusters of men wear long tunics over baggy trousers, a costume common in Pakistan but virtually unknown among Palestinians — until recently.
It is an emblem of Salafism, a branch of Islam that advocates restoring a Muslim empire across the Middle East and into Spain. Some Salafis preach violence, even killing Muslims deemed not pious enough. While historically a fringe group in the southeastern Mediterranean, Salafis have sought inroads in Lebanon and Jordan and are battling Hamas in Gaza.
While Al Qaeda, which shares its conservative religious views and promotion of holy war, has not gained a foothold in the region, Salafism may be the wave of the future. In Algeria and Morocco, similar movements have expanded in the past two decades to create havoc through civilian bombings and attacks on the police.
“This is the challenge we face in the world,” said Bilal Saab, a researcher in Middle East security at the University of Maryland in College Park. “We are getting better at dealing with insurgencies, though Afghanistan is proving to be an exception. It is much more difficult to combat the constant threat of underground urban terrorism.”

thabet 1:37 am on October 28, 2009 Permalink |
What tunic/baggy trousers are these? The shalwar kameez? Since when did the shalwar kameez become an ‘emblem of Salafism’?
null 4:53 am on October 28, 2009 Permalink |
Ask Dan.
Safiya Outlines 5:19 am on October 28, 2009 Permalink |
Salaam Alaikum,
This article typifies why a little bit of knowledge is a dangerous thing.
Nevermind that many Salafis are apolitical… and generally wear thobes, not shalwar kameez
johnpi 6:47 am on October 28, 2009 Permalink |
I took it to mean in the Arab Gaza strip context. Perhaps Salafis there are choosing to differentiate themselves by wearing shalwar kameez.
I thought this was an interesting observation in the context of how many comments and articles we see about Arab cultural imperialism coming in the guise of religion. Here, we have a story about an aspect of South Asian culture – arbitrarily associated with religion – establishing a beachhead in an Arab country.
johnpi 6:51 am on October 28, 2009 Permalink |
Not that I’m trying to get all ‘armchair anthropologist’ on you, but it runs against the grain of the “Arab imperialism” meme so it’s provocative that perhaps we should rethink that.
thabet 7:18 am on October 28, 2009 Permalink |
John,
I’ve just read the report again, and it also like the report is a load of rubbish, given this is the NYT reporting on Gaza.
‘Cultural imperialism’ is also about power, political or economic, and not merely a group of people mimicking someone else.
johnpi 7:29 am on October 28, 2009 Permalink |
How do you arrive at the conclusion that the individuals involved are just engaged in mimickry, playing dress-up?
I’m challenging the language we use here: “imperialism,” “mimickry” as possibly being overwrought and too harsh…as you observed in the post below this about the NYT’s article on Indonesian extremism, would we ever cast our descriptions of social/religious/political movements in the US in such terms? I think not.
thabet 7:48 am on October 28, 2009 Permalink
John,
I don’t claim to know what they’re involved in. I just find the idea that “South Asian culture” has formed a beachhead in the Near East a little odd, especially when it is cast as an ‘emblem of Salafism’.
Gulf Arabs using their considerable wealth to ‘revive’ Islam in (say) Cambodia (especially at the expense of the local customs) is a different kettle of fish.
johnpi 7:54 am on October 28, 2009 Permalink
If I understand your point correctly, you don’t want to see the real issue of Arab imperialism diminished by being put into equivalency with this report. OK that’s fair.
Dan 7:18 am on October 28, 2009 Permalink |
Salafism wouldn’t have gained inroads in Lebanon if it weren’t for that idiot Saad Hariri.