More like this.
I put Dawkins as the Brown Gargantua…he is marginally less toxic and certainly brighter.
And actually, Dawkins is not a fundamentatist….he is an evangelist of atheism.
Since the definition of fundamentalism is reversion to older, more “pure” beliefs, that is sort of impossible for scientific atheism.
shams 3:29 pm on October 12, 2009 Permalink |
More like this.
I put Dawkins as the Brown Gargantua…he is marginally less toxic and certainly brighter.
And actually, Dawkins is not a fundamentatist….he is an evangelist of atheism.
Since the definition of fundamentalism is reversion to older, more “pure” beliefs, that is sort of impossible for scientific atheism.