MI5’s (official) secret history revealed:
[...]
“We thought if we had a history, we could assign to history all those allegations and stories that have been around, with someone not in the service making a professional judgment about what really happened,” [former MI5 director-general Stephen] Lander said. “And it would be possible not to have to be dragged back in the press or anywhere else to stories about the Wilson plot, or about whether we investigated John Lennon, or studied Mickey Mouse … or all the rest. The answer is, ‘Read the book.’ “
The biggest open secret is that MI5 kept a file on Harold Wilson. Unsurprising too that Margaret Thatcher wanted to use the agency to spy on trade unions. The most interesting and contemporary revelation surrounds ‘Islamist terrorism’:
The 1,000-page volume, published Monday, describes an organization that fought Hitler with stunning success but struggled to combat Soviet espionage during the Cold War and initially failed to grasp the threat from Islamic extremism.
Andrew claims MI5 was “slow to see the coming menace of Islamist terrorism.” The book says the agency’s then-head, Stella Rimington, had never heard the name al-Qaida until a meeting in Washington in 1996, during which MI5 representatives were “taken aback by the interest” in Osama bin Laden shown by the Americans.
I wonder if the links between the agency and figures like Abu Qatada are investigated in the book:
Britain ignored warnings — which began before the September 11 attacks — from half a dozen friendly governments about Abu Qatada’s links with terrorist groups and refused to arrest him. Intelligence chiefs hid from European allies their intention to use the cleric as a key informer against Islamic militants in Britain.

Tec15 9:28 am on October 8, 2009 Permalink |
Judging from Andrews previous works (such as the Mitrokhin Archive), the entire book is likely to be a whitewash of MI5’s more unsavoury works and what can not be simply denied (because they are already too well known) will instead be minimized and placed in their “proper”context.
thabet 9:32 am on October 8, 2009 Permalink |
Take it for what it is. An “official” history which will document stuff no one really cares about/nothing can be done about.