After the Battle of Uhud, it is narrated that the Angel Jibrail came down and gave the well-known declaration: “There is no hero but Ali, there is no sword but Dhulfiqar.”
In light of that, and to turn to the stories of the sahaba, rather than modern thought or the intellect God gave us, I thought of these two stories. The first is from Rumi (although surviving the Mongol invasion may make him a bit of an effete faqih):
*Words of ‘Ali when he refused to kill an opponent who spat in his
face.*
For God’s sake, for Reality
whose slave I am, I wield this sword.
The body does not command me,
nor does the lion of craving
overcome the lion of God.
Like a sword wielded by the sun,
I embody these words in war:
Thou didst not throw when thou threwest.-
I’ve dropped the baggage of self.
The which is not God is nothing.
God is the sun, and I am a shadow.
Jewelled with teh pearls of Union,
my sword bring life in battle, not death.
Blood will not dull my shining sword;
nor will the wind blow my sky away.
I am not chaff but a mountain of patience.
What fierce wind could lift a mountain?
What the wind blows away is trash,
and winds blow form every side ƒ~
the winds of anger, lust, and greed
carry away those who do not keep
the times of prayer. I am a mountain,
and my being is his building.
If I am tossed like a straw,
it is His wind that moves me.
Only His wind stirs my desires.
My Captain is love of the One.
Anger is a king over kings,
but anger, once bridled may serve.
A gentle sword struck the neck of anger.
God’s anger came on like mercy.
There is also this profoundly moving story that I tell often when delivering wa’z:
The Stranger
Taken from Anecdotes of Pious Men, Allama Murtaza Motahhari
Tired and exhausted with the water-skin on her back, she was gasping and going towards her house where innocent children, their eyes fixed at the door, were eagerly waiting for the arrival of their mother. On her way, an unknown man approached her. He took the water-skin from her and placed it on his back. The door opened and the children saw their mother entering the house with a stranger. He placed the water-skin on the ground and said:
“Well, it seems you don’t have anyone to fetch water for you; how come you are so forlorn?”
“My husband was a soldier; Ali sent him to the frontier where he was killed. Now I am alone with these small children”
The stranger said no more. Bowing down his head he went away. But the thought of the helpless window and orphans remained in his mind. He could hardly sleep in the night. Early in the morning he picked up a basket; put some meat, flour and dates in it; went straight to her house and knocked at the door.
“Who are you?”
“I am the man who brought your water yesterday. Now I have brought some food for the children”
“May God bless you and judge between us and Ali”
She opened the door. Entering the house she said:
“I wish to do some good acts. Either let me knead the flour and bake the bread or allow me to look after the children”
“Very well, but I can do the job of kneading and cooking better than you. You take care of the children till I finish cooking”
She went to knead the flour. Immediately he grilled some meat which he had brought and fed the children saying to each child while putting morsel in his mouth:
“My son, forgive Ali if he has failed in his duty towards you”
The flour got ready; she called: “Gentleman! put fire in the oven” He went and put fire in the oven. When flames rose up, he brought his face near the fire and said,
“Taste the heat of fire. It is the punishment for those who fail in their duty towards orphans and widows.”
By chance, a woman from the neighbouring house came in. Recognizing the stranger, she cried: “Woe, don’t you recognize the man who is helping you? He is Amirul-Muumineen (commander of the faithful) Ali bin Abi-Talib”
The widow came forward and shame facedly cried:
“Curse and shame to me. I beg your pardon.”
“No, I beg your pardon for I failed in my duty towards you.”

aziz 1:54 am on January 23, 2009 Permalink |
live like Ali; die like Husain
amin
historylover 7:34 am on January 23, 2009 Permalink |
An incident similar to that to that of \”Stranger\” is attributed Umar (R.A)
Jake 4:11 am on July 3, 2009 Permalink |
Ali ibn Abi Talib (a.s) failed in his duty.. to anyone???????????? this sounds like another made up hadith wrongly attributed to Imam Ali (a.s). As the last commentator states, it’s been attributed to Umar as well.. ’nuff said!!
Buzz Kill 12:54 pm on July 3, 2009 Permalink |
The lives and stories of saints are not supposed to be analyzed in this way. “It was Umar not Ali.” “She had three children not four.” “It was fish he brought, not lamb.” What does it matter? Most of these stories have a hint of excess and hyperbole in them. Do you really think any soldier had the time to pontificate in the middle of a battle?
They are only supposed to be inspiring and encourage the higher nafs.
Jake 2:37 am on July 6, 2009 Permalink |
Heyyy.. there’s a thought..wot is the point of analysing history?? let’s all go along the principle of twisting history according to our own opinions as long as it inspires and encourages the higher nafs!! Let’s just shove fact right out of the door!! Let’s make up our own characterististics of personalities as we see fit!! Let’s fit events according to our own imagination!! let’s just make up events and attriribute them to any personality!! wadda ya say??
Buzz Kill 8:25 am on July 6, 2009 Permalink |
That is basically what you call “religion?”
History is something completely different,
Idealizing history is religion.,
Jake 8:38 am on July 13, 2009 Permalink |
“idealising history is religion”??? wot a load of tosh!! wot are u smoking buzz kill?? coz wotever it is, it aint working!!!
Buzz Kill 11:28 am on July 13, 2009 Permalink |
How do you know until you tried it? Maybe it is working great.
Anyway, if you take your standard religion ( I am not talking about reality here, I am talking about the mass hysteria we call orthodox religion, fundamentalism, evangelism, etc) you have a central figure, you take his or her life story, leave out parts that conflict with your premise, emphasize and twist the other stuff to support your premise.
This is how we kill in the name of religion. And all the other horrible stuff.
You have a problem with that? Tell it to you know WHO (pointing upwards)
Jake 7:15 am on July 15, 2009 Permalink |
How very patronising of u buzz kill. Yes I do have a problem with that: u turning a discussion from one point to another, a case of moving the goal posts. It started with u suggesting that it’s Ok to twist events as long as it “inspires and encourages the higher nafs” to a discussion of how ppl use/abuse belief for their own personal agenda/purpose. Stick to one thing at a time. And nope u aint gonna get that philsopher’s degree. “Aaaaahhh little clicket sayings of Buzz Kill he says…”
Buzz Kill 11:49 am on July 15, 2009 Permalink |
Jake, you are too easily upset. I was not trying to be patronizing, I was only making a point. There is no disconnection between someone who takes the life of a holy person and retells it according to their own idea of what was honorable and praiseworthy
and
someone who has their own agenda and uses the lives of Propjets and Saints to further their own agenda.
I am just being a little more open and honest about it.
You could say that this phenomenon totally explains the degradation of religion from inspiration to ritual and tradition. And it totally encapsulates the saying, “The road to hell is paved with good intentions.”
Buzz Kill 12:16 pm on July 15, 2009 Permalink |
There was a Sufi’s book, Shah Maghsoud I think, I was reading recently and they were discussing Plato’s Dialogues. They said, when Plato describes Socrates, his wisdom and his actions, actually Plato is describing himself.
This is not necessarily a bad thing. It depends on the intellect and righteousness of the mind of the reteller. But there is no getting around the fact that we get further and further from the actual subject (the reality of the historical figure).
Crabby 3:32 am on July 16, 2009 Permalink |
I think the second story about Ali is morally antiquated. I prefer this report of Ali, very manly indeed, found in Kamali’s “Freedom, Equality and Justice in Islam” where he referenced Ali Abd al-Wahid Wafi’s “Huquq al-Insan fi’l Islam”:
Ali, it is reported, had a dispute with a Jew whom he took to a court where Umar was presiding. Umar addressed the Jew by his name but called Ali, out of respect, by his appellation Abu al-Hasan. This invoked Ali’s displeasure, and when Umar asked Ali whether he was unhappy because he had to attend the court with a Jew, Ali replied that on the contrary he was unhappy because Umar had not accorded equal treatment since there was discrepancy in the tone of the address and the choice of the litigants titles used.